But the guns weren't big enough to be a BB

And then it had enough secondary guns to level a small fleet

but it was battlecruiser fast

Yeah but so were the Bismarcks

Can we just appreciate how mental the German engineers were who developed these

Which is why they defied classification, hilariously enough.

lol

Like turtle back armor is a pretty fucking lit concept

Turtleback is half the reason the Germans could continue using traditional armor layouts

Then you throw on enough armor and guns to level fleets

Oh and let's just fucking make it fast too

Whereas everybody else was like "nah fam all or nothing"

Germany be like "hold my beer I'm going to do German things"

Pretty much

I mean look at the Panzerschiff

What even is that

Is it a BB? Guns are there, armor's not. Is it a BC? Not enough displacement. It's too well armed to be a CA, but it can move like a CL.

This is why germans are banned from ship building

They just make things naturally OP

Well... not always.

Looking at you THREE SHAFT PROPULSION

Shhhh

WHO PUTS THREE SHAFTS ON A SHIP AND WONDERS WHY IT CAN'T MANUEVER WITH RUDDER DAMAGE

COME ON GERMANY

I WANT TO GET OFF THE RIDE

wow, reddit promoting that chinese social score shit

Bait

Lads, TIL IRS gives kickbacks if you report massive evaders

Yes and

Up to 30%

Report sadmin

I already tried

Fucker keeps his books clean

>Battleships had no secondaries
Niggerwhat
All Battleships had secondaries, they needed the smaller guns to deal with motor torpedo boats and other small, fast moving, targets that the main guns could not effectively engage.

*sigh* my god

Yes I know.

Comparitively however, when going from pre-dread, to dread, to fast BB, the secondary battery was sacrificed in exchange for larger main battery guns and armor mass.

Also, >BB secondaries firing at MTBs

You have bigger problems in that scenario

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/761153/EU_Exit_-_Legal_position_on_the_Withdrawal_Agreement.pdf

legal advice published on May's Brexit deal