@Mojo No U<:TamamoDab:483459011463741451> <:tamamodab2:485506018227257346>

Bukkaking, textile or solid?

Because if you say textile you're talking out your ass

talking level 3A aramid woven

Raiders are based

is there anything written about anyone using it as a projectile anywhere?

LMAO TEXTILE STOPPING 2-4g

This is why I am trying to save my britbong friends

@RoflTank Bukkaking only has one option, fluid.

PELE writeups use something similar to engineering polymers

Oh shit

Bukkaking is a dude

It's an advanced AP round for autocannons being tested

yes 3a textile will stop 36gr moving at under 1200 fps

gram

not grain

think about it like this, a 9mm is 115gr+ moving at about 1k

and 3a defeats it handily

Textiles have to be specialized to provide 2-4g fragmentation protection, which makes them weaker to larger projectiles due to the limits of textile armor

Do you sectional desnity?

9mm is a shit penetrator

wouldn't you think 36gr moving at 1200 would be defeated just as easily?

Nope

Superior sectional density provides superior armor penetration

@Bukkaking Is that the Generation Identity logo as your pfp?

SAS a big gay prove me wrong

APFSDS is the prime example of sectional density providing extreme penetration benefits

Sorry to interrupt but I know they use a black and yellow lambda for their logo

More mass behind less cross section = better AP

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WrokNC3Clc

but its only 36gr dude

Kinetic energy is based on velocity not mass.

you can get that much FPS from a 36 gr projo out of an airgun

so you are telling me an airgun could theoretically defeat 3a?

>ball projectile
>wonders why it cant penetrate

Hmmm

Off topic but, are all business websites fucking black and white

@RoflTank F=m*a

I only know of 1 9mm that defeats 3A

@FireRising that's cute but Ek = 0.5 * m *v^2

Saying mass does not matter is turbo retard mode.