Message from @MAC21500
Discord ID: 518657406826184741
@Bukkaking Is that the Generation Identity logo as your pfp?
SAS a big gay prove me wrong
APFSDS is the prime example of sectional density providing extreme penetration benefits
Sorry to interrupt but I know they use a black and yellow lambda for their logo
More mass behind less cross section = better AP
but its only 36gr dude
Kinetic energy is based on velocity not mass.
you can get that much FPS from a 36 gr projo out of an airgun
so you are telling me an airgun could theoretically defeat 3a?
>ball projectile
>wonders why it cant penetrate
Hmmm
Off topic but, are all business websites fucking black and white
@RoflTank F=m*a
I only know of 1 9mm that defeats 3A
@FireRising that's cute but Ek = 0.5 * m *v^2
Saying mass does not matter is turbo retard mode.
mass * velocity^2
What do you think matters more?
compare to a 223 which is a 55gr+ at 2800fps+
big difference
True but your original point was "Kinetic energy is based on velocity not mass."
Impact energy increases linearly with mass but quadratically with velocity
Ergo, you can accelerate sand grains fast enough to crater a continent
.22lr still isnt making it through soft body armor
agreed
.22 routinely defeats soft armor though
sure, if you consider body armor to be cotton and leather
Not even kevlar or aramis
aramid
But Rofl, that isn't going to work for a handheld weapon system in this century.
think about it like this, 5.7 cannot defeat 3a most of the time
and it has higher sectional density and higher velocity than .22LR
The idea of a sand grain cratering a continent with velocity that is.
Actually Fire, if it wasn't for the atmosphere that'd happen regularly.
Well the atmosphere is here so that's a moot point huh?
Okay, which conversation am I on
And I said using a handheld weapon system not the power of gravity wells you ultranegger
Bukka did I address your point?
I'm off for the night. You lads have a good one.