Message from @TuerSchlossEnteiser
Discord ID: 677484884385595392
What did they say?
Nike is gay
The shoes are narrow 😢
In the future: function > form
I am never getting something again that doesn’t work for me
Should I read lolita?
Everyone's saying I should read it
Read it if you're a pedophile
nothing beats Sam Harris on Regan talking financial inequalitity and not talking about inheriting 500 million comedy dollars
boys are skinny attractive women confirmed
Seems degenerate but I guess that's the point.
Yeah but it's a classic novel
Haven't you seen the movie
Lots of degenerate "classics" btw
There's like 10 classics about prostitutes
do you even infinity bruh?
No, haven't seen the movie
Seems like the novel provides a better look at the character's psyche, which is the point of the book, to get in the mind of a pedophile.
>he hasn't seen all kubrick films
imagine investing 500 million in a movie and then corona scares everyone out if the cinema
>doesn't watch collative learning
Idk the movie just seemed like it was just pandering to pedophiles tbh, I don't know why it's a classic, I'm pretty sure it's just the equivalent of 20th century erotic fanfiction
Like ok what was I supposed to get from it
i read lolita
i think it's different to read than to watch the movie
it's about hypergamy and you know that stuff already
The writing voice is that of a madman's
you mean beta simpin' voice
Probably because of the type of people who consume 'the classics' are pedos. Used to be that critics were a high-class intelligentsia, back when the only way you could consume lots of media was to be wealthy. These people are invariably hedonists, and therefore pedos, pedos in denial or borderline pedos.
Probably the reason people love confessions by Mishima for all the wrong reasons.
do you know the theory salinger was pedo too? he's catcher of the rye, the main characther is actually a pedo too
hypergamy? that's a unique interpretation 🙂
As a person who knew that is was just a famous book before reading it, don't read it
most books are like overvalued and if you don't know how to read between the lines, you'll end up as a english lit major
People seem to only want to read it because it's famous. Is it a good book? Regardless of the subject matter is it actually good?
I don't think so. Could've been written better.
Also, you have better things to read than this temporal dust