20% non homo sapiens

but 99,99% the same

thats insane

imagine having 20% genetic composition of literal sub humans

Uhh it's ghost humans bigot

jf should cover both of this

two orange, I think, are eruasians vs africans

yes and explain this in detail

JF should cover ur mum

NERD

from bullets

yes

Sub Saharan Africans had 0 contact with the rest of humanity for 10k years

not long enought to NOT be human

200k

I always thought that "simp" came from "simpleton"

but it did caause a gap

200000

do you have a source for the 200k?

we have humans in europe 200k ago

so

ONE SECODN!

I know the earliest discovered human in europe is 200k years

SECOND

!!

do you want to know who the ghost species is?

is that West Africa

its called chimps

???

Aren't Africans direct descended of homo erectus because they didn't interbreed with neanderthals?

davd reich says 75,000 years, others say 200k

wow

(((Reich)))

Was the west African Slavetrade literally 20% more inhumane than any other?

yes

I have some sort of evidence, depending on when we mated with neanderthals

as blacks don't have that

> Aren't Africans direct descended of homo erectus because they didn't interbreed with neanderthals?
@Yev kassem apparently they did interbreed with another local subspecies

That must be the ghost population then @MatrixJuve