Message from @Unironic Ohio Supremecist
Discord ID: 675383867892301854
Did you not refer to the "horrors" of segregation earlier?
i said that's what he was doing, and that was his context.
@VladTheImploded
Lol. I am doing precisely that, you dishonest individual.
your inability to separate reality from the fantasy in your head is not proof of dishonesty.
Lol. See your earlier advice about projection...
Why are lolbergs like this...?
you literally concocted this theory that i'm a (insert label here). it's adorable.
Lol. Nope.
you: "you're a cultural marxist"
me: "no i'm not"
you: "yes you are, you've been doing it all this time"
me: "prove it"
you: "look at how marxist you are!"
🍿 🐱
tell me the truth, are you anita sarkeesian in disguise?
--warn @VladTheImploded Civlity
okay, that's fair
that was a bit rude of me
--debaterules
This channel is for debate and these rules are to keep it a clean environment for productive dialogue. Feel free to go elsewhere if you don't wish to follow the guidelines for this channel.
1. No personal attacks. Debate is about ideas, personal attacks will not be tolerated.
2. Content must be on-topic. This isn't a meme or joke channel, serious content only.
3. Do not citation spam. If you wish to cite something that is fine but if you wish to post large amounts of links please use the <#266401012967931905> channel.
Enforcement of these rules is up to moderator discretion. If you would like to call a staff member please tag the moderator or administrator roles. Warning will be issued and if continual disruption occurs you will be removed from posting in this channel temporarily or permanently.
Or...
Me: Oh. So you're a cultural Marxist?
You: MaRxIsm BAD!!!1!!!
Me: But you just applied Marxian critiques to culture...?
You: ME NO REDISTRIBUTE WEALTH!!!1!!
Me: ... like I said... to culture...
You: ME NO REDISTRIBUTE WEALTH! U PROVE!
Me: Okay, your explicit endorsement of racial egalitarianism...
You: U NO PROVE! ME WIN! U CUTE!
Would be a more accurate description.
debate rules is right, i should never have let myself get involved with a discussion not about my original idea.
===
AOC did a good job by not attending the state of the union. It'll be easier for her politically to defend not being there than it would have been to explain not applauding some of the very good things like her peers will have to do next cycle.
Lol. Unlikely.
If her district is changing, I'm guessing she'll run against whomever is representing her new district instead?
So assuming she's running regardless, i think my point still stands?
No.
Your point wasn't really supported regardless. And as that article points out, the redistricting will likely make her chances even more grim.
thank you for your input. i value you.
Lol. Seethe more.
AOC is toast
she went too far in the true believer shit, that's why the district thing is getting redrawn to screw her
Basically.
Plus, the Trump crackdown on noncitizens voting is going to hurt her.
contrary to the fox news boomer takes all over YT, nancy pelosi is neither a demented radical nor an idiot
Oh, wait... the CM may be offended by a word like "noncitizens"...
she's a capable politician who knows what she has to do to keep her speakership as safe as it can be
it's not lost on her AOC represents a real threat to her congressional power
@A. Spader
Meh. More likely AOC is a symptom, than the disease.
But otherwise, pretty much.
sure
I'm not suggesting AOC is brilliant ether
yeah, i agree with you both. the census rules changes and redistricting will certainly hurt her. hell, i'm pretty sure i read an article saying her own district doesn't even approve of the job she's doing. and i hope she doesn't get re-elected because i think she's a pox on the system. i was specifically talking about her choosing not to go to the state of the union.