It seems to fluctuate.

you need only look at the gun debate

the left is more than willing to give up their freedom to own firearms under the guise of security

i am not

But it doesn't effect person to person

it affects us all.

yes, and "us all" will never agree on what that line is

and what is t he root cause of this in your view?

uh.. that people are different and have different ideologies?

Ah ha

and all it takes is for an ideaology that does not vaule freedom to become dominant for a time.

to ruin everything.

sure

Why tolorate the intolorable?

our law is somewhat resistant to that

because we are a republic based on a constitution

with inalienable rights as far as the government is concerned

u don't tolerate u have to live with it @мιяαgє

to prevent.. "tyranny of the masses"

i mean... what is tolerance in this regard?

isn't living with it the same as tolerating it @desperado

could be

i feel like when you talk about "intolerance of intolerance" you walk a path in which you become the monster you are trying to destroy

what's wrong with monsters?

not tolerating it means u have to do something about it and if given the chance I would

i mean, of course I would oppose anyone who wants to upend the constitution

#monsterslivesmatter

I oppose people who want to ban bump stocks and shit

that's just called disagreing

Same.

Is lineing up them in a firing squad and shooting them and their family

and sending them to gulags

just disagreeing as well?

(:

no, that would certainly cross into the territory of monstrous behavior

especially if the crime is "disagreeing with the goverment"

How does one prevent the proliferation of monsters then?

now, if somebody bombs a federal building, killing hundreds

sure, put them before the firing squad

or whatever the execution method of the age is.

just a note, Mirage, we're not alt-right here and suggestions like ethnostates or culling would probably get you kicked