Message from @Relic 1776 | DiscordLeaks

Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.

Some ways to protect yourself are:

Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
Follow safe browsing practices including JavaScript blockers like NoScript.
Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.

If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.

Message from @Relic 1776

Discord ID: 456984758845440022

2018-06-15 00:50:07 UTC

Yes I know but is there proof to back that

2018-06-15 00:50:17 UTC

# 1497 POTUS in possession of (and reviewing):
1. Original IG unredacted report
2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]
3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]
4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified)
[#3 released tomorrow]

2018-06-15 00:50:22 UTC

1 un-redacted, 2 redacted, 3 re-written

2018-06-15 00:50:25 UTC

Is there anyone who has said this was the redacted version? Besides Q

2018-06-15 00:50:39 UTC

we got today was the re-written version by rr

2018-06-15 00:50:55 UTC

Proof?

2018-06-15 00:51:00 UTC

redacted is rr with a sharpie

2018-06-15 00:51:01 UTC

RR is certainly a snake

2018-06-15 00:51:15 UTC

unredacted is ig's original report

2018-06-15 00:51:29 UTC

Has any Republican Congressmen said this is the redacted version?

2018-06-15 00:51:42 UTC

I havent seen anyone say it

2018-06-15 00:51:44 UTC

gowdy i think

2018-06-15 00:51:52 UTC

Link?

2018-06-15 00:52:00 UTC

Gowdy is questionable

2018-06-15 00:52:16 UTC

not off hand...he's been saying this is bs on several news clips today

2018-06-15 00:52:28 UTC

I'm just looking for one person saying that today's report was a redacted version besides Q

2018-06-15 00:52:32 UTC

If #4 notes have not been altered, it should show a disconnect between the redacted report and the notes. I don't know when those will be released though.

2018-06-15 00:52:42 UTC

Historically all talk and no action (Gowdy)

2018-06-15 00:53:04 UTC

Unless only Trump and the Q team know its redacted

2018-06-15 00:53:20 UTC

comey keeps saying he's a republican, yet his history says another story...he sucks up to dems while being critical of republicans

2018-06-15 00:54:16 UTC

Comey goes as HRC goes

2018-06-15 00:54:28 UTC

I don't consider myself a Republican

2018-06-15 00:54:32 UTC

Or Democrat

2018-06-15 00:54:38 UTC

They are all the same

2018-06-15 00:54:59 UTC

All of them were positioning for power in a Clinton administration

2018-06-15 00:55:05 UTC

I support Trump but hes not the establishment Republican

2018-06-15 00:55:09 UTC

IG has to know it is redacted.

2018-06-15 00:55:16 UTC

Never dreamed she would lose

2018-06-15 00:55:26 UTC

i consider myself a conservative liberal...or a liberal conservative...depending on the idiot asking me which

2018-06-15 00:55:44 UTC

Still waiting for one person in power saying today was a redacted version

2018-06-15 00:55:47 UTC

translation - i make up my own dam mind

2018-06-15 00:55:49 UTC

That's much of why I support Trump

2018-06-15 00:56:27 UTC

I'm searching online for anyone in the media or any Congressmen saying today's IG report was redacted

2018-06-15 00:56:33 UTC

I cant find any

2018-06-15 00:56:36 UTC

Any help?

2018-06-15 00:56:41 UTC

Hmm

2018-06-15 00:57:45 UTC

Maybe that's why we did not see any text of today's original

2018-06-15 00:58:34 UTC

If nobody is saying anything it means only Q and trump are privy to this info

2018-06-15 00:59:01 UTC

Or there isnt any other one

2018-06-15 00:59:01 UTC

Meaning it was heavily redacted

2018-06-15 00:59:25 UTC