4 a.m talking points... Associated Press (AP) - who owns AP? (rhetorical)

on the public stage

Why was NATO created? (rhetorical) What is the Tri-Lateral Commission? (rhetorical) What is Open Society?(rhetorical) Why was the Euro established?(rhetorical) Who benefited?(rhetorical) Where were T.A.R.P. funds invested?(rhetorical)

This is one of ours

For a change not an event local to the U.S. and the main audience here

No Au version of Hannity to dilute or debunk the MSM rhetoric

I have seen nothing to suggest that the 4 a.m. reports go to Au journalists or outlets

At a glance it feeds the public cause to level hate at Russia and its leadership

Correct me if wrong but that is not helpful

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/lisa-page-confirms-the-chinese-not-the-russians-hacked-hillarys-emails/

Au is still connected to the crown correct?

relevance?

to your 4 am comment

I am addressing the downing of a passenger aircraft, probably arranged by the D.S.

beit the U.S. or an EU version or branch

relevance?

M. we are talking at cross purposes. Than you

thank you.

Off topic, but somewhat related: If Q has told us to be ready for a flood of new people, it might be helpful to have a room with relevant links/articles that help them make sense of things. Only a select few would be able to post things in there(mods?) and it could form a time line of sorts that would guide their discovery and perhaps get them digging deeper. ie Smith-Mundt act changes that allow propaganda

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/18/world/europe/hungary-migration-united-nations.html

@Irshmun as a follow up to your crown comment, are you saying/suggesting that because Au is connected to the crown, the media would be "crown controlled" and therefore have no real ability to have a "Sean Hannity" on air?

good qu @lmbd

re the crown; a Q post some weeks ago announced the British monarchy is / was neutralised

B.F. lately took it one giant step further and to my shock reported that the queen had switched teams

now supporting the Trump, perhaps making sense of her distaste for little princess pushy libtard

Since there is no public disclosure of this nor anything else, we can but ponder

@lmbd requires my further patience while he types 😁

Lol, gathering my thoughts..takes a while, as they are scattered widely. 🙂 Not sure who B.F. is...? Canada would likely have the same issue. I saw a video recently where Trudeau pledged allegiance to the Queen, and part of it was putting the crown's interest first, keeping conversations secret... paraphrasing....but... if the crown's interests come first that could explain why there is no real oppositional tv voice in either country.

hoooray he got there 😁

B.F. is Benjamin Fulford; see (channel) ufoswig

Add to that the Soros influence which is evident in Canada and the wrong voices get the bulk of of the airtime and political influence.

well re the media, I have by choice hardly viewed it at all lately, but the little I have seen, the reports report snippets from America's MSM, like

wait for it

CNN

and often put up liberal or pro left reps when they put up American analysts

eeeeeew

However they do add the odd snippet or sentence that reports a pro Trump stance, here and there

sometimes

such an adjunct is ofc. entirely absent in the archetypal MSMs lead by project mockingbird