Why are some of these groups parasitic

When I mean usually I mean orthodox Christianity’s patriarchs can change their mind

I believe its culture

not ethnicity

Chechens can be pretty reasonable too compared to Arabs

the harsh environment and lifestyle I believ leads to overrepresentation in the Taliban, ISIS, etc

similar to Pashtuns

and Kashmiris

ahahahahahha Based
Virgin Church with one Head (Pope) and universal doctrine and dogma
VS.
Chad "Church" with differently opinionated patriarchs and non-universal doctrine
@Deleted User

@Deleted User How did the USSR and Russia historically treat Caucaus peoples?

Do you think a Slavic Union would be better than retaining South Russia?

ie Caucaus

or Eurasia is a best option?

@Deleted User well the Bolsheviks did massacre 2 million people in Caucasus

Many Russians are of Caucasus decent

Read up on the kurgan theory

@Nicholas there are different sects of Catholicism

>there are different sects of Catholicism
What do you mean?
To be considered a Catholic, you need to accept Catholic dogma which is universal.
If you mean different liturgical rites, Orthodoxy also has different rites.
But all liturgical rites of the Catholic Church follow the same doctrine and dogma.

If you're a modern Catholic you reject that dogma

Only Sedevacantists follow it because Vatican II is illegitimate

Well, I am a Sedevacantist
And yes Novus Ordites are not real Catholics

Like sects Catholicism which does not agree with each other

Example?

If someone denies Catholic dogma, he's not Catholic...plain and simple

I know someone who is Novus Ordo and thinks he's still trad

😔

Like there are sects of Catholicism who disagree with popes

First of all, Sede is vacant and it has been that way since Vatican II
Second, not everything pope does or says is infallible.
He is infallible when, in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church.

>everything the pope does or say is infallible

Kill me

NOT everything

Exactly

Sorry

I am dyslexic

And it’s sort of the same with orthodoxy

Yes, but Canonizations are considered infallible in Catholicism.

Yeah but palamas is not canon

But he is a Saint?

But that doesn’t mean that his ideas were canon

It means that he was a holy man

A very holy man