Message from @_lin_
Discord ID: 481661416223539200
lol
"You can blow down windmills... but you can't hurt coal." - awesome!
Went to the family big screen. This is pretty good
What a great time to be alive and aware
Big Screen? Are you talking Projector like i always watch POTUS rallies?
Nah, just the regular 42" in LR where all can enjoy at same time
I was rooting for the "not presidential" routine. Was still fire but i love that skit.
Comcast + Amazon Firestick
Mildly lame
Had the c-span web feed on. Man i would love some surround sound for those rallies. POTUS on center speaker and the audience on the others.
Our house is torn up with mold water damage. My son went to his freahman at
Purdue
And I look at all my fellow researchers and I love you all ❤️
I admire you all. I wish I was as talented as you all. Just know there’s people like me who don’t say it but appreciate your research , your insight, your dedication. I do
@Bleezer -following up Re: your ALJ Q uestion in relation to Q drop 1926 - MJA - Military Judge Advocate/ JAG - Judge Advocate General...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judge_Advocate_General%27s_Corps,_United_States_Army ALJ - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_law_judge https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-enhancing-efficiency-americas-administrative-law-courts/
The fact that ALJs are now considered Officers of the United States , rather than, simply employees of the U.S. - is indeed Q uite an interesting point to consider. Article I tribunals
Article I tribunals include Article I courts (also called legislative courts) set up by Congress to review agency decisions, military courts-martial appeal courts, ancillary courts with judges appointed by Article III appeals court judges, or administrative agencies and administrative law judges (ALJs).
Article I judges do not enjoy the same protections as their Article III counterparts. For example, these judges do not enjoy life tenure, and Congress may reduce their salaries.
The existence of Article I tribunals has been controversial, and their power has been challenged before the United States Supreme Court, which has determined that Article I tribunals may exist, but that their power must be circumscribed and, when a potential deprivation of life, liberty, or property interest is involved, their decisions are subject to ultimate review in an Article III court.
*Falls under an Article I Tribunal Classification* : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_military_commission
Defines article I II and III - Federal Tribunals (Read all the way to the bottom 1,2 and 3 break downs and how they may apply to the Presidential EO referenced above. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_tribunals_in_the_United_States
When we look at the sheer volume of sealed indictments (45k+ and growing daily) certain considerations for a "speedy" trial had to be considered and possibly accommodated? 😉
Im reading that spinning magnet book BTW that wa one of the Q books from that list
Its funny like scientists claim to know how our universe works none of them even know how electromagnetism works
The smartest ones dont know
Where did this lion insignia for trump come from?
If this all works out then trump has to be associated with the symbolism of the lion
If you haven't registered to vote... do it now. Everything hinges on these midterms.... request a paper ballot - it's your right to.
@R1V37H34D Thanks for the information!
great, just what we need now, more bombs dropped on soldiers that died for our freedom
btw, both my parents are buried there
things u find on other servers - https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/445707039428313088/481832084328153108/39239683_10217505584496744_7936513781008433152_n.png
When you find rhetoric of this nature the first Q uestion that must be asked is... does it unite or further divide?