Message from @LowLandsPete
Discord ID: 496767117090357248
Anything on the ebs mate ? @R1V37H34D
Q. drops..
Envelopes sent to Mattis, Navy chief test positive for ricin
That Q drop is strange with the two Reddit ads. Occult symbols?
There is an all seeing eye
Saturn
Red Rose - Rosicrucians
saturn/satan all seeing eye and pyramid five pointed star o david (house of den) Rosicrucian rose(?) and the new (Pizzagate)/Pie
one fun club
i think the dolfin is pedo too
@R1V37H34D That’s the first Ive ever heard of violent stoners! Haha
@R1V37H34D 0ld news dating back to Feb. 20, 2018
@Dustin Nemos - weak links at https://www.dustinnemos.com/forums/index.php
I cannot stay logged in for more than two minutes. Posts are gone. Must log in again and repost. Please see if there is a fix. Thanks.
How is this a violation of the First Am ? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/lawsuit-seeks-to-stop-femas-presidential-alert-system-to-cell-phones-citing-first-amendment/
@R1V37H34DToday at 11:45 AM
http://www.newsweek.com/clarence-thomas-impeachment-perjury-sexual-harassment-812953
OLD NEWS dated back to 2/20/2018
new Q- Kavanaugh vote tally? My Q post # is off..different sites have different numbers. Should be the same as Desimated's #2317
what does it even mean....
Oh, @lmbd maybe! i didnt think of that...
do we have a vote that is not being published 53-47
???
wouldnt they need 60?
5. Full Senate vote
The full Senate vote is where things could get dicey for Republicans. Democrats can force Republicans to gather 60 votes in the Senate before the nominee is confirmed. There are 52 Republicans in the Senate. That means Democrats can effectively block — or "filibuster" — the confirmation if fewer than eight Democrats support Trump's pick for the high court.
i see debates still happening
no vote
hmmm perhaps prelim
Nuclear option?
Thank you at @R1V37H34D. I was looking online to see if there was a vote, but hadn't found anything yet. https://www.businessinsider.com/brett-kavanaugh-senate-vote-who-will-support-vote-against-2018-7
Pense can break a tie vote.
oh, interesting:
"When former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid invoked the nuclear option in 2013 — and changed the Senate rules so it would take only a bare majority of senators to confirm all nominees except Supreme Court picks — Republicans were furious. They called Reid's move foolhardy, pointing out that one day Democrats would suffer the consequences of the rules change when they end up in the Senate minority with a Republican in the White House.
That day has arrived. And now Republicans potentially have the power to further change the rules so the minority can't even block a Supreme Court nominee.
However, it takes 51 votes in the Senate to employ the nuclear option. And Republicans may not have the votes. Already one Republican — Susan Collins of Maine — says don't count on her vote.
"I am not a proponent of changing the rules of the Senate," said Collins on Monday evening. "I hope that common sense will prevail and that we will have a normal process for considering this nominee."
Vice President Pence could supply the 51st vote for Republicans to invoke the nuclear option. But without Collins on board, Republicans can lose only one more vote."
ah, i believe your talking about that @Xenios2011
Yes. Thanks.
common sense was thrown out the window ms Susan Collins lol
Have some more senators been activated like L. Graham?
53 47 would work in the nuclear option which is what they will have to do they most likely wont get 60
The football 😄
good dot connectory @Cuban Fish
Has Q squashed two Q drops? Numbers are different. Previous 2314 and 2315 appear to have been replaced. Ricin story at Pentagon - link now gone.