400+/- years

https://youtu.be/-uOa2unXLlw

plasma and such is a by product not the driving force within the sun

@Irshmun think sweaters coming out of the dryer

when the particles finally separate from all that dry heat....they generate a static discharge

What is the driving force within the SUN?

electro magnetic fusion

Do you believe its a Nuclear Furnace?

fission/fusion under weight of gravity

NO

Its Electric

we have no clue thats what im saying we can only observe a tiny spectrum

its NOT Nuclear

i'm not saying that either

squeeze something hard enough..something is bound to react

well we don't know for sure

the Physics to Prove a Nuclear Sun is SO SKEWED, its not even FUNNY, you are better off believing in fairys that grant you wishes

Everything we've been told about the SUN is wrong

all we do know is every time u drop a nuke under the ocean...the shear mass of the water around it is alot greater and causes the explosive force to be smaller than if it was dropped at sea level or higher

that all comes in an age of nuclear power so then people tend to link the two

Tesla was talking about Ether not electricity

sticky, also the fact that so much granite(hardened lava)...has uranium traces in it and still is radioactive...makes u wonder what is at the center that is so dam heavy that it breaks down into slag and uranium and other materials

ether is the state above plasma

YES, However, we have a guy who tried to prove Einsteins theory based on star-light refraction during eclipses... Turns out we dont need eclipses to refract light around a star, especially if its in a LIQUID STATE

magnetic can cause refraction...so can some fluid states of matter

even thermals of air can cause it

heavy mass objects

All Im saying is that AstroPhysics is quite flawed, both in Theory and Respective reality

well it is run by the vatican

I think they are HIDING real Science from us

Sticky you seem to think that science claim to KNOW everything but its mostly called a theory for a reason.

NO I DO NOT

u can't even buy a big enough telescope without dealing with them

Science is a PROCESS

nor build one

It starts with a "THEORY"

they are "educated" guesses just a valid as yours and mine

Then it progeses to "HYPOTHESIS"

also...u can't launch a rocket or sat with a surface scanning camera unless u deal with NOAA

right and you end up in a dogma

Then the Questions are asked, Peer reviews, repeatable conclusions and then, maybe then, it will be accepted as PROVABLE SCIENCE