https://twitter.com/AlwaysIntegrity/status/1093305645669982209

Exactly the lady is dead. That was her funeral.

@SirW00f didn’t a guy on x22 report spotlight say he got offered to blow that up or have i got the wrong building ? It was to destroy evidence at any cost

Most likely died in December or early January.

I don't know however at the time there were numerous reports of explosives found throughout the building which failed to detonate.

mc vaybe or something like that was his name of the 'guy' that bombed that building

nothing is ever what it seems

No possible way. Impossible to blow it up externally like that.

see 9/11 wtc demo for details

Timothy McVeigh.

Yeh but a guy on x22 Spotlight claimed he was offered it well pretty much forced and refused and ended up in a shoot out and escaped.. this was months back on x22 Spotlight channel

on how they blew up a well constructed building that could survive a plane impact yet still fall to dust

Energy weapons were used on 911. Not sure how much internal explosives were used. Directed energy was most likely the primary means of knocking it down. Now the holes from the supposed planes were caused by explosives in the buildings.

We know because of the cars and other vehicles destroyed by these energy weapons.

Much more like the California Wildfires which destroyed the homes but left the trees standing for the most part.

masers

As the buildings fell the steel falling simply turned to dust. Explosives do not do that.

things i do as a hobby end up being using in 9/11

i think the steel side beams that supported the outside had to be sprayed with something...far as i know nothing not even lasers or masers can vaporize metal without it going ultra white hot first

The TV Tower hundreds of feet tall simply turned to dust as well as every beam that fell. There were also very large holes that cut through different areas many feet across. 20 or even 30 feet wide. Very deep. Building 6 had the inside destroyed, The strongest part of it. The outside was still somewhat standing. Hard to believe they lined all of these buildings with that much explosives. Directed energy makes far more sense.

Some of the Vehicles were burned partially. The front or back not destroyed the rest was. What does that? Directed energy.

actually the columns are hollow from top of the building down to the foundation

The Elevator shafts are. I am talking about the steel that makes held up the TV antennas. I beams and such. Some are hollow but most are I beams.

anyway...my maser research was restricted to 1kw....parents wouldn't let me get more power

the i beams were the structural support for each floor...they used hollow block columns for vertical support

most of the concrete was concentrated on floors exclusively

it was mostly steel and glass building

except for the center shaft for the elevators

and air management system

how ever...on the basis of other forms of energy weapons...

Rather sure the walls were made of I Beams. But yes the floors had poured concrete on them. Not the walls. Unusual back then. Most buildings had the elevator and stairs encompassed with concrete to make it safe from fire and damage.

neutron has some vaporizing effects on various materials without going into visible ultra-white hot plasma state

steve, i've been to the wtc when i was a kid

part of a class tour from my school

Yes neutron bombs possible but that still would not explain the tower simply turning to dust. Or the round holes.

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/aoxa80/us_navy_to_us_dod_we_are_defenseless_against_a

@Riggy17 (UK) there was a insider that had lots of info on Oklahoma bombing,on caravan to midnight.. I’ll see if I can find it

steve, i never said neutron bombs

my nacer research was neutron based particle beam weapons

think laser but replace light with neutrons

used to be a radium paint factory abandoned in my city....very easy to get samples for experimentations