Message from @ShinyPants
Discord ID: 512716329095004188
How has nobody taken this to the SCOTUS
Even the most libtarded SCOTUS judges would have to see this as a violation of our constitutional rights
And these "elected" chucklefucks, where is the representation?
The constitution was specifically drafted to prevent this kind of democratic mob rule, because democracy is fucking garbage. We're a god damn CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.
Oy vey
You're a democracy now
The French must be behind this somehow.
<:happymerchant:263435754779312130>
Or the Anglos.
I mean, almost noone in congress gives a shit about the people, they just care about being reelected and lining their own pockets
I hate Anglos so fucking much.
if they think that gun control can keep them in power for a bit longer they'll do it weather its actually legal or not
DELETE
CAREER
POLITICIANS
there should be a 1 time, 2/4 year term limit
But we know what's best
:^)
no reelection in play
House bill seeks to define assault weapons as “Any semiautomatic rifle or shotgun that comes with the capability to accept detachable magazine devices”
hahaha
from my cold dead hands
Currently sponsored and cosponsored by 17 house representatives
So they're just going to continually tax or fee us until the price of obeying the law is high enough that there's no reason to go about things legally
I believe that rebranding them as assault weapons is so they can initiate an “assault weapon confiscation”
So no tax, just theft
inb4 “whats the difference”
I mean I dislike both of them in different ways
<:tomcruise:266125168844341248>
Inb4 turns out Ca set the fire themselves to access federal funds
Honestly would'nt be surprised
Is it possible to simply bribe homeless people to go out and set more fires
probably possible, though dubous morality
Yes
Morality is very subjective
Would something being dubiously immoral stop someone?
Not a Californian.
All Californians are sociopaths to some degree.
t. Californian.
Can confirm, ex californian