Message from @Magos Squid "The Life Raft"

Discord ID: 505491286590095360


2018-10-26 21:06:24 UTC  

I'm talking about your wise guy 109 or spaceship Spitnig that has no more than 1 second of ToT (Time on target) and your bomber just falls apart like Papier-mâché

2018-10-26 21:14:47 UTC  

Yeah no

2018-10-26 21:15:08 UTC  

A lone bomber vs a german fighter has no chance

2018-10-26 21:15:23 UTC  

or any fighter tbh

2018-10-26 21:15:24 UTC  

Extremely situational

2018-10-26 21:15:42 UTC  

From all reports on the Axis and Allies side it is extremely situational my guy

2018-10-26 21:16:40 UTC  

Those bombers are only tough against flak, fighter fire will easily rip apart an aircraft. The problem is actually aiming and scoring a hit

2018-10-26 21:16:54 UTC  

That's just not true though

2018-10-26 21:16:57 UTC  

A big target with no cover by itself is an easy kill for any fighter

2018-10-26 21:17:38 UTC  

Some of the largest batches of info of German Fighters vs B-17s is from Operation Husky

2018-10-26 21:17:46 UTC  

The allied invasion of Sicily

2018-10-26 21:18:32 UTC  

In that theatre, Mid -1943 That was really the peak of both the Allies and Axis side with overall performance

2018-10-26 21:18:34 UTC  

@RoflTank You know more about this

2018-10-26 21:19:49 UTC  

Time and time again you saw where yeah, in some situations there would be a German fighter that gets the hits it needs to kill the B-17, in other situations the B-17 would take what it had to give and more, while still making it home. The majority of B-17s lost in Husky was due to the overwhelming amount of Flak placed in key areas of the Island

2018-10-26 21:19:53 UTC  

It depends if the gunners get a licks shot

2018-10-26 21:20:08 UTC  

And that's the fucking B-17

2018-10-26 21:20:34 UTC  

A good hit by a .50 to the pilot or engine could force the attacking fighter to break off or kill it outright

2018-10-26 21:21:20 UTC  

The B-17 was an outdated heavy bomber (designed in 1936), going slow enough for a fucking Bi-plane to catch it

2018-10-26 21:21:38 UTC  

By the time of 1943 that is

2018-10-26 21:21:47 UTC  

Up until 43 it was fine

2018-10-26 21:21:54 UTC  

but it was pushing it's luck that far

2018-10-26 21:23:30 UTC  

@Magos Squid "The Life Raft" During and post-war, testing showed that a single Mk108 30mm firing HEM needed only 5 rounds to cause catastrophic airframe failure on your average bomber.

2018-10-26 21:23:52 UTC  

Well yeah, that's the best thing they had

2018-10-26 21:23:59 UTC  

I'm talking about the average 20mm cannon

2018-10-26 21:24:15 UTC  

20mm HEM needed significantly more shells, something like 40-60, mainly because while it had a fuckload of HE per shell, it was still a tiny 20mm shell.

2018-10-26 21:24:33 UTC  

MG 151/20 and in comparison Hispano Mk.Vs, AN/M2s, and then whatever the fuck the Nips used

2018-10-26 21:24:54 UTC  

Meanwhile 30mm HEM model A had like... 85g of HE, more than most bomber-hunter 37mm guns had in their HE shells

2018-10-26 21:25:09 UTC  

Yeah, that's what I'm aware of, Rofl

2018-10-26 21:25:18 UTC  

If you scroll up, you'll see my point

2018-10-26 21:25:22 UTC  
2018-10-26 21:25:31 UTC  

Hispano V and AN/M2 were both far better with SAPI than HE

2018-10-26 21:25:46 UTC  

Type 99 was hot garbage

2018-10-26 21:26:00 UTC  

why tho

2018-10-26 21:26:10 UTC  

Just a ghetto-tier cannon

2018-10-26 21:26:22 UTC  

Like most guns the Nips had at the time

2018-10-26 21:26:36 UTC  

Does it shoot? Yes? Ok.

2018-10-26 21:26:47 UTC  

Last I checked it had shit veloicity, shit shells, shit construction, shit time between failure, just shit everything

2018-10-26 21:27:10 UTC  

The IJN literally loaded practice shells because they were more effective than their combat shells

2018-10-26 21:27:20 UTC  

F

2018-10-26 21:27:52 UTC  

"Hey guys, our guns jam constantly"
> "Just make it so you can un jam the ones in the nose from within the cockpit"
"Doesn't that say something about how shit it is?"
> "Nah man it'll be revolutionary"

2018-10-26 21:28:10 UTC  

Good ol' squint-eyes