How is there a correlation between how common something is and how good it is?

More sales generally correlates to quality on basic bitch pccs

Anderson and bottom shelf mfgs excluded

I understand that but I don't quite understand the assertion made by Runes that things like the Cx4 may be inherently bad just because they don't sell as much

Just take something where people have more knowloedge about

something "certified" in a way

Idk, maybe I'm just a hipster faggot

I want a PCC that isn't the Ruger or the Sub 2K and is a long gun, basically

Ar9

Jp

I feel like an AR in 9mm is better as a braced "Pistol"

Theres pro cons

Yeah the ARs in pistol calibers and .300 memeout seem to me to be best in a short weapon, whereas 5.56, 6.5 Grendel, 6.8 SPC etc work best in longer barrels

.224 valk

223 wylde

300 blk is built to run in a short barrel with can

.223 wylde isn't a cartridge but I feel it's better in 16"+

.458 socom and .50 Beowulf might be fun in a short barrel tho

Not efficient really

They are both memes

I know, that's why it might be interesting to do a .50 Beowulf pistol with a 5" barrel and a loudener on it

Do you like your hearing

@Nic386 you specifically asked for “less common” PCCs

Don’t do an AR9. They have a lot of parts breakages because of bolt velocity.

Better than an adapter

I know everyone wants them, but PCC groups are full of people trying to figure shit out

I like the evo most

I like the Evo as well, but I can't get one right now

Why

Under 21

I’d probably get a CZ Scorpion. But that Ruger PC is pretty sweet and I have probably two dozen Glock mags

Ruger is eh

Why?

Just as a brand?

Nah

I was finger fucking a pcc and it was just ok

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I think they’ve done some smart design decisions with it.

Gun stores around here can’t keep them on the shelves

My lgs always has kel tecs