Message from @Inazuma

Discord ID: 493843218660589574


2018-09-24 16:02:00 UTC  

*pig iron on their diiicks*

2018-09-24 16:06:53 UTC  

The Panzer'd not turned turret for a shell had fairly ripped, and the Russians aim was deadly with the pig iron on their dicks

2018-09-24 16:31:19 UTC  

PzIV had 50mm of armor before the F series applique plates added another 30mm, G/H series had factory 80mm plates.

2018-09-24 16:31:53 UTC  

Tiger had like... 102mm

2018-09-24 16:32:50 UTC  

Panther and KT had ungodly amounts of armor, BUT, hilariously enough, one of the most armored tanks of WWII was actually the Hetzer.

2018-09-24 16:33:06 UTC  

It had like 120mm effective

2018-09-24 16:37:32 UTC  

Also can we just talk about the Hetzer Kugelblitz that was proposed?

2018-09-24 16:39:31 UTC  

The Hetzer one?

2018-09-24 16:41:02 UTC  

The tiger's armor was ok when it came out but it was outclassed by new tank guns that could easily engage 102mm of unsloped armor at long range by the time the western front opened

2018-09-24 16:42:25 UTC  

It would have been a good method of moving an 8,8 around except for all the engine, transmission, ext issue

2018-09-24 16:44:06 UTC  

So the Hetzer kugelblitz was basically the Kugelblitz turret mounted on further modified Pz 38(t) chassis?

2018-09-24 16:52:32 UTC  

>Hetzer Kugelblitz

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/483396318111465482/493827086734196736/chinese_war_face_violence_has_exculated_meme.jpg

2018-09-24 16:53:15 UTC  

Too bad the Hetzer was fucking cramped as shit tho

2018-09-24 16:53:49 UTC  

Also how effective would an E-10 actually be?

2018-09-24 16:54:16 UTC  

The little ambush casemate twin barrel rocket TD

2018-09-24 16:57:16 UTC  

Probably not very. The E25 would have been a fucking monster though.

2018-09-24 17:23:45 UTC  

Tho a towed gun tractor that can back up its gun would be cool

2018-09-24 17:24:00 UTC  

A what?

2018-09-24 17:38:57 UTC  

So basically an IFV with a tow hitch.

2018-09-24 17:39:23 UTC  

Or an APC with a tow hitch so you can truck the crew and the gun

2018-09-24 17:56:38 UTC  

yh

2018-09-24 19:00:15 UTC  

Why not just a portee?

2018-09-24 19:00:18 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/483396318111465482/493859241136881665/image0.jpg

2018-09-24 19:00:54 UTC  

Or do you mean that the tow vehicle can provide direct fire support for the gun crew?

2018-09-24 19:44:09 UTC  

My absolute favourite what if is the IV project W

2018-09-24 19:45:12 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/483396318111465482/493870538255630337/image0.jpg

2018-09-24 19:46:07 UTC  

You have an 80mm upper plate, sloped, 50mm sides, sloped, and vastly simpler production, and actually *increase* the space in the hull

2018-09-24 19:46:25 UTC  

Combined with the simpler box turret

2018-09-24 19:46:33 UTC  

Cancelled in late 44, sadly

2018-09-24 19:47:05 UTC  

Nah

2018-09-24 19:47:32 UTC  

The Pz.IV was long past its expiry date

2018-09-24 19:47:44 UTC  

It still worked

2018-09-24 19:48:13 UTC  

It doesn’t have to compete with IS-2’s and Pershings, it’s dealing with Sherman’s and T-34’s

2018-09-24 19:48:14 UTC  

All the mods needed to make it actually modernised and fit for future proofing would be so drastic you might as well make a new tank, hence the Panther

2018-09-24 19:48:37 UTC  

You don’t need a future proof tank

2018-09-24 19:48:37 UTC  

The suspension, engine, internal layout, etc

2018-09-24 19:48:44 UTC  

>You don’t need a future proof tank

2018-09-24 19:48:46 UTC  

You need a tank *NOW* and you need an adequate one

2018-09-24 19:48:50 UTC  

Okay retard

2018-09-24 19:49:06 UTC  

Then you get the T-34 which was shit

2018-09-24 19:49:22 UTC  

Germany didn't have the blessing of being able to pump shit out non stop