Message from @Reichtangle

Discord ID: 493872384005111814


2018-09-24 19:47:44 UTC  

It still worked

2018-09-24 19:48:13 UTC  

It doesn’t have to compete with IS-2’s and Pershings, it’s dealing with Sherman’s and T-34’s

2018-09-24 19:48:14 UTC  

All the mods needed to make it actually modernised and fit for future proofing would be so drastic you might as well make a new tank, hence the Panther

2018-09-24 19:48:37 UTC  

You don’t need a future proof tank

2018-09-24 19:48:37 UTC  

The suspension, engine, internal layout, etc

2018-09-24 19:48:44 UTC  

>You don’t need a future proof tank

2018-09-24 19:48:46 UTC  

You need a tank *NOW* and you need an adequate one

2018-09-24 19:48:50 UTC  

Okay retard

2018-09-24 19:49:06 UTC  

Then you get the T-34 which was shit

2018-09-24 19:49:22 UTC  

Germany didn't have the blessing of being able to pump shit out non stop

2018-09-24 19:49:29 UTC  

Unless it was the 109

2018-09-24 19:49:34 UTC  

Which was weirdly what they needed

2018-09-24 19:49:35 UTC  

Hmm

2018-09-24 19:49:37 UTC  

Big think

2018-09-24 19:49:52 UTC  

More of a good tank right now and worry about the big shit later

2018-09-24 19:50:05 UTC  

Another upgrade to the stop-gap Pz.IV wasn't what germany needed on the ground

2018-09-24 19:50:17 UTC  

They needed more tanks on the ground

2018-09-24 19:50:26 UTC  

More good tanks

2018-09-24 19:50:54 UTC  

The Panther was great despite its flaws, its just the crew training and deployment suffered in late war

2018-09-24 19:52:16 UTC  

So you’re implying that 80mm of sloped armour combined with a gun that *works*, instead of the IV H they *continued* to produce

2018-09-24 19:52:32 UTC  

Would be a bad idea

2018-09-24 19:53:13 UTC  

So a Panther, got it

2018-09-24 19:53:15 UTC  

I’m not saying “stop making panthers and make this”

2018-09-24 19:53:29 UTC  

Actually yeah true the panther had the same armour

2018-09-24 19:53:31 UTC  

Huh

2018-09-24 19:53:48 UTC  

Anyway my point is they should have gone with it instead of the H/J

2018-09-24 19:53:54 UTC  

The Panther is what they needed. They didn't want Ausf H's but retooling for two completely new tanks is retarded

2018-09-24 19:54:24 UTC  

They re-tooled for the J, slightly

2018-09-24 19:54:45 UTC  

And you wouldn’t need to re-tool for many new parts

2018-09-24 19:55:10 UTC  

>completely redone chasis wouldn't need retooling

2018-09-24 19:55:15 UTC  

It shares the front plate with the *already in production* Jagdpanzer IV, and internals and suspension with the H

2018-09-24 19:56:20 UTC  

That was the point

2018-09-24 19:56:25 UTC  

The JagPan has a hole in it's plate

2018-09-24 19:56:27 UTC  

🤔

2018-09-24 19:56:34 UTC  

Yes

2018-09-24 19:56:37 UTC  

So when you make it

2018-09-24 19:56:40 UTC  

Hmm, i guess they just don't cut it then

2018-09-24 19:56:48 UTC  

^^^

2018-09-24 19:56:51 UTC  

Bingo

2018-09-24 19:57:22 UTC  

Tiger is gay, they should have just made panthers earlier and had an open top Panther with an 88

2018-09-24 19:57:38 UTC  

To be fair the panther was a reaction to the T-34