I’ll even say bumpstocks are gay AF but that’s not the point

If they want a machinegun drill the 3rd hole and earn your felony like a man

lol

It's almost like every president does this. They have the house and senate for their first 2 years and don't do shit. Trump did it, Obama did it, I can't remember but I'd be surprised if Bush didn't

Lmao

He’s going to have it way harder than Bush or Obama ever did for the second half of his first term. Not only is he a cuck, but the entire media establishment is ready to pounce on him along with the deep state he threatened to drain, and he doesn’t even have loser republican cucks to ‘maybe’ help him.

The next two years are gonna be fucking crazy. And frankly Trump is going to deserve a lot of the shit that’s coming his way.

not only that but with the fears of a recession being stoked

Gamers need to rise up

they'd have to get out of their basements first

^^^

We are indeed approaching the economic peak

So, a recession isn’t too far down the road.

Which means job security

Job security for who?

Me

Economic downturn means crime goes up

It's pretty dark to think about but hey gotta think positively

I lived in CA for the last one

Glad I’m not there any more.

I bet

I lived in Philly for the last one

It sucked a bit

Where do you guys buy soft cases and whatnot?

A $79 camo case from Cabela's isn't doing it for me atm

Amazon

sometimes midway has good deals on soft cases

https://www.firearmspolicy.org/lawsuit-challenging-trump-bump-stock-ban?fbclid=IwAR0qDFFzbm7shnkrX53vnhwTw4_ckziaY1mLuNQgyVQ9wifwD3G1qzWerkY

Snake Hound Machine:
"Everyone file a Form 1 for your bump stock so we can challenge the machine gun ban in court when it's rejected."

Why tho

That’s silly

i wasn't really sure what the point was

***you wouldn't download a Maus***

https://blog.princelaw.com/2018/12/18/ficg-files-complaint-and-motion-for-preliminary-injunction-challenging-atfs-final-rule-on-bumpstocks/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook

Earlier today, the Department of Justice released the approved Final Rule on bumpstocks. As was expected, the Rule alters the definition of the term “machine gun” (in the regulations pertaining to the Gun Control Act and National Firearms Act) to include the following language

* * * For purposes of this definition, the term “automatically” as it modifies “shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot,” means functioning as the result of a self-acting or self-regulating mechanism that allows the firing of multiple rounds through a single function of the trigger; and “single function of the trigger” means a single pull of the trigger and analogous motions. The term “machine gun” includes a bump-stock-type device, i.e., a device that allows a semi-automatic firearm to shoot more than one shot with a single pull of the trigger by harnessing the recoil energy of the semiautomatic firearm to which it is affixed so that the trigger resets and continues firing without additional physical manipulation of the trigger by the shooter.

Among other things, the suit alleges that Matthew Whitaker lacks the authority to implement a final rule, challenges the ATF’s violations of the Administrative Procedures Act, and argues that ATF usurped its authority by rewriting the definition to a term that Congress had clearly defined.

so

their final definition is still technically incorrect

“single function of the trigger” means a single pull of the trigger and analogous motions.

may be worrying

for binary triggers

but per their factually incorrect definition, is bumpfiring equivalent to "manufacturing" a machinegun like shouldering a brace was "manufacturing" an SBR?