sometimes midway has good deals on soft cases

https://www.firearmspolicy.org/lawsuit-challenging-trump-bump-stock-ban?fbclid=IwAR0qDFFzbm7shnkrX53vnhwTw4_ckziaY1mLuNQgyVQ9wifwD3G1qzWerkY

Snake Hound Machine:
"Everyone file a Form 1 for your bump stock so we can challenge the machine gun ban in court when it's rejected."

Why tho

That’s silly

i wasn't really sure what the point was

***you wouldn't download a Maus***

https://blog.princelaw.com/2018/12/18/ficg-files-complaint-and-motion-for-preliminary-injunction-challenging-atfs-final-rule-on-bumpstocks/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook

Earlier today, the Department of Justice released the approved Final Rule on bumpstocks. As was expected, the Rule alters the definition of the term “machine gun” (in the regulations pertaining to the Gun Control Act and National Firearms Act) to include the following language

* * * For purposes of this definition, the term “automatically” as it modifies “shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot,” means functioning as the result of a self-acting or self-regulating mechanism that allows the firing of multiple rounds through a single function of the trigger; and “single function of the trigger” means a single pull of the trigger and analogous motions. The term “machine gun” includes a bump-stock-type device, i.e., a device that allows a semi-automatic firearm to shoot more than one shot with a single pull of the trigger by harnessing the recoil energy of the semiautomatic firearm to which it is affixed so that the trigger resets and continues firing without additional physical manipulation of the trigger by the shooter.

Among other things, the suit alleges that Matthew Whitaker lacks the authority to implement a final rule, challenges the ATF’s violations of the Administrative Procedures Act, and argues that ATF usurped its authority by rewriting the definition to a term that Congress had clearly defined.

so

their final definition is still technically incorrect

“single function of the trigger” means a single pull of the trigger and analogous motions.

may be worrying

for binary triggers

but per their factually incorrect definition, is bumpfiring equivalent to "manufacturing" a machinegun like shouldering a brace was "manufacturing" an SBR?

Anyone want a bulletproof bandana?

Then get a bulletproof hat lmao

Bulletproof yellow vest too

Someone say Bulletproof Hat?

https://bulletsafe.com/products/bulletproof-baseball-cap
Not even fucking memeing

Combine them

https://terminallance.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/2012-08-24-Strip_220_Issued_web.gif

basically the second panel

Add one of those bulletproof backpacks

https://www.instagram.com/p/BrgAzGtACau/?utm_source=ig_share_sheet&igshid=s6v6csotge5w

This discord in a nutshell

The fucking cowabunga memes are pretty gucci

https://www.instagram.com/p/BrkwnyyHM7U/?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet

https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2018/12/18/bump-stocks-federal-register/

Page 144

Alternative 3- Opportunity alternatives. Based on public comments, individuals wishing to replicate the effects of bump-stock-type devices could also use rubber bands, belt loops, or otherwise train their trigger finger to fire more rapidly. To the extent that individuals are capable of doing so, this would be their alternative to using bump-stock-
type devices.

lol that one guy just straight sucking his canister

Swiss Space Bubba

Less bubba and more xuxxa

that K31 was done by Sureshot Armament Group

they have an aluminum version

thats 2 versions too many