Message from @MAC21500
Discord ID: 549639058696044574
Karl of InRangeTV seems to think the IAR is tits
but I don't understand why
It's not a bad rifle
It's pretty good
when they did a lightweight AR build
IAR is a porker by comparison
and their WWSD builds arent piston
"external piston"
Oh yeah no the IAR is a fat cunt
12lb AR or 14lb MK46...hmmmm
i know the russians use RPKs, but I think the shift towards mag fed SAWs is due to smaller regional conflicts and not total war
just like the OVERMATCH theory coming out of afghanistan
I don't get mag-fed SAWs
You kind of defeat the purpose
but they can share mags with everyone else
isn't that wonderful?
I think it's a pretty cool change. The 243 was pretty fun though.
If yur SAW needs to use grunt mags you're fucked anyway
they’re basically switching out their SAWs for LSWs
how many mags fit in the space of one 249 box
and what's the ammo difference
about half
200 round box vs 6 mags and some change
right, but look at the dimensions
STANAG in a 249 basically renders it a straight pull bolt action lol
you can carry more belted ammo than ammo in mags in the same space
I dislike grenadier and dmr roles being shared
I think having at least one beltfed per squad would be ideal. Those mags go fast on full auto.
Whoa, almost like belt feeds are the most efficient means of storing large quantities of ammunition for an automatic weapon
6x30= 180, meaning that you loose 20 rounds every 200 round box you replace
Not like that's been common sense for over a century
Plus I think they look aesthetic
^
no, stack 6 PMAGS next to a 200rd 249 box
6 pmags are taller
So it's even less efficient
Plus, you had the a gunner carrying boxes for you too
^