If we're going for serious conversations, don't read plato, he backs up homosexuality in most of its points

no he doesn't lmao

more like less of half of his texts

in the majority of his points he considered it an abomination, unholy act, contrary to human nature and etc

you're completely ignorant on my country's history

as expected

Okay then what did you read about it?

the kikes obviously prioritise the most negative and degenerate things about our history for their modern agenda

I just told you

what did you read about it?

aside from the bullshit that he encouraged it

which I already read and it's debunked multiple times

https://global.oup.com/us/companion.websites/9780199315468/student/ch5/wed/plato/

I think you completely misunderstand by his definition of the male to male relationships he encouraged

in Ancient Greece these were called platonic relationships and the type of 'love' (that you retards are too thick to comprehend and attribute it to sexual perversions and etc) actually has nothing to do with sexual contact and etc, it's a relationship of understanding, teaching the youth (male boys) discipline from a young age, a trade and etc, the adult males are intended to be more of like a fatherly figure in a sense

I read the symposium, by many considered the main work by plato, it literally is a conversation about love by the intellectuals of his era. Both in Italian and ancient Greek. Now I asked the question to you too, what did you read by plato? Also at least be consistent in your claims, don't compliment me 2 days before for then say I know nothing about ancient Greece "as expected"

Let's move to <#604498916687478784> @ΕΘΝΙΚH ΑΝΤΙΣΤΑΣΗ

k

https://images-ext-1.discordapp.net/external/3YinOYa33IvMzCMGtP5ZqF_wyjyxPikM6jgclWLhJSw/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/502467942118588416/621714257658249227/garf.gif

I used to watch Garfield as a kid

what did the nazis have against slavs?

nothing

it's completely misunderstood

Himmler was referring to the (((Judeo-Bolshevists))) of the east

not slavs as a race

The slavs were just in the way, it wasn't personal.

But that was only some of them

if the reich had anything against slavs then why did they accept so many slav volunteers like Croats, Bosniaks, Serbs, Ukrainians and etc

Russians are gay anyways

Realpolitik?

Manpower?

etc.

read the nuremberg laws

it's not hard

I assume those are other reasons

Slavs are Aryan as with the rest of the Indo-European groups