Message from @Dinosorcerer
Discord ID: 406357290120380417
it's almost like visible members of your community acting like reprobates with almost no guiding voices telling people to calm the fuck down gradually leads to your group becoming stigmatized.
The issue being that the way feudalism works, the workers need to be tied to the land for their liege lords (and you will need those to respond to local issues) to effectively manage them. And with our highly mobile workforce, it just wouldn't work. She's a social scientist. She ought to know the reasons it would probably fail.
Right. People say crazy stuff when it's off the cuff.
It sounded like she was thinking about it for a while, and Ape was agreeing with her
Weird.
I think she genuinely believes it could somehow work
Well if she's got an idea I'd like to hear it because I don't see a way that could end in anything but something worse than North Korea.
Like, you would need intentional class based restriction of technological access to even begin to make that work.
Like a caste system where only members of certian castes were allowed to access to the internet, cars, etc.
She didn't go into specifics, but I think she's got this ideal in her head that she hasn't carefully thought out.
And they say it's "fair"b by pointing out that the peasent farmer caste gets exclusive access to modern farming equipment.
Like, I'm glad their doing Western Front again, but man, that shit was laughable.
"Well, you'll get more Marcus Aureliuses than Neros" first off, Nero's bad reputation is greatly exaggerated. Second, how do you fucking know that? Certainly Rome's history didn't give you that impression, did it?
Many a skeptic has latched on to the idea that Nero's reputation was rectonned onto him as a form of Christian propaganda.
So of course, that makes it good info.
I don't know about all that. I mean it's possible, but unlikely. We know the dude was a nutter, but he wasn't for example, playing the fiddle as Rome burned.
But that's the thing, you don't even need particularly bad rulers to fuck things up in that kind of system
And if you're doing it by heredity, then it's a roll of the dice
Yeah you can get completely blasted out by a "good" ruler. Because the system, working as intended, means the average person's life must be nasty, brutish, and short.
Looks like someone found out that you can't call people Nazis on a whim.
I actually like Monarchy, as King Philip IV of France showed there was not much need for the title serf.
And @@AydinPaladin has said that she has read Democracy the god that failed so...
And tbf I haven't finished that one yet.
if Democracy is the god that failed, what does that make feudalism?
A greek style god that is brutal, uncaring, willing to harm others for it's own pleasure. But it didn't promise anything else. "I'm a god. I'm in charge. Don't question me. Now bend over and take it."
@Valet the Clown it is important to note, however that Phillip relied more on his civil servants than nobles or orders of knights. he even went so far as to disband the Knights Templar. in many ways he eschewed the feudal system.
That was my first point my dude @Dinosorcerer
There were no serfs but it certainly was still a Monarchy.
but that's not necessarily feudalism then
It is a Monarchy.
you can't have feudalism without the system of feifdoms
they were advocating for feudalism not just monarchy
or at least they said feudalism
whether they actually know what that entails or they were just using it as synonymous with monarchy I can't say
I'll have to watch it.
I view Monarchy and Democracy as private property vs public property.
Aydin brings up a central monarch, but I don't think she talked about barons or other lords