Message from @Critty
Discord ID: 536179859156762634
VR skydiving, pretty much the same thing
I'd be sky diving all day if I had VR
If a woman has a baby and chooses to not feed it, because that's her exercising her bodily autonomy, whats so wrong about that?
note = trying to find a way to trap pro-choice libertarians
well, the baby has basic human rights
and the woman has a responsibility to care for that child as the primary caregiver
see heres the trap
the child cant take care of itself
so it needs the mom to get of her ass and feed it
thats the thing yeah
what if the women says = "you can't tell me what to do with my body, i can sit here and do nothing"
well, you punish her lazy ass
you need to violate her right to be a lazy selfish cunt
but don't you know?
Libertarians = you have the right to be a lazy selfish cunt
hmmm
true
this is where i get them
i mean a baby outside the body takes a lot of effort to feed and take care of properly
the 9 month gestation was barely half the battle
if you raise them tiger mom style i mean
which i think is most common way
If a mother is willfully neglecting her child and it can be proven in court, she deserves to lose any say over the child
As well as custody
yeah but remember we are talking to autistic libertarians
they want anarchy and no govet
And the neglectful mother should be jailed
sure but you're a sane person
imagine being a lolbertarian
I know quite a few libertarians that are rather sound
i'm sure you do but i know a ton of psychos as well
i imagine they would bring up the NAP or golden rule
but here there is a clear conflict
between the interests of the mother and the baby
and remember there's no govt
we are in ancapistan
and the mother is bigger and stronger than the baby
the dad is too busy managing the harem to pay attention to one woman
Question!
Objection!