the child cant take care of itself

so it needs the mom to get of her ass and feed it

thats the thing yeah

what if the women says = "you can't tell me what to do with my body, i can sit here and do nothing"

well, you punish her lazy ass

you need to violate her right to be a lazy selfish cunt

but don't you know?

Libertarians = you have the right to be a lazy selfish cunt

hmmm

true

this is where i get them

i mean a baby outside the body takes a lot of effort to feed and take care of properly

the 9 month gestation was barely half the battle

eh, not really that much effort

if you raise them tiger mom style i mean

which i think is most common way

If a mother is willfully neglecting her child and it can be proven in court, she deserves to lose any say over the child

As well as custody

yeah but remember we are talking to autistic libertarians

they want anarchy and no govet

And the neglectful mother should be jailed

sure but you're a sane person

imagine being a lolbertarian

I know quite a few libertarians that are rather sound

i'm sure you do but i know a ton of psychos as well

i imagine they would bring up the NAP or golden rule

but here there is a clear conflict

between the interests of the mother and the baby

and remember there's no govt

we are in ancapistan

and the mother is bigger and stronger than the baby

the dad is too busy managing the harem to pay attention to one woman

Question!

Objection!

@The-Free-Monk what exactly is the issue with libertarians

I hear the lolbert thing a lot so just wondering where it comes from

you cant have some rights without taking away other people's rights

That’s it?

tons of other stuff

you can look it up online honeslty

i recommend listening to Eric Striker for more in depth analysis