Scenario 1: The human species gets over all of its problems and lives peacefully for the next 400,000 years but goes extinct due to nature or entropy.

Scenario 2: A nuclear holocaust occurs people could not have ever possibly have gotten over their problems and everyone dies in the wake of nuclear fire and humanity goes extinct.

Whats up? brothers

Why should perhaps 400,000 years of people living relatively peacefully be worth more than only 10 more years until a nuclear exchange, yet the human species goes extinct regardless?

@the adventures male Just a neutral nihilist stuck in limbo from the Void. Happens too often...

That doesn't answer my questions lol

No need for hydrogen bombs soon yellowstone will erupt with a greater force

I never even said that I was a nihilist per se, but I don't see how your approach to trying to say that your approach is any better than nihilism is successful...

I get your point Seven, there is an endless stream of questionability and triviality of life. I just bite the bullet, take a chance and hope for the best.

That is what is different between us then. I'm not a man of faith commitments.

Biting bullets is simply too much for me, especially when biting bullets simply leaves nothing but teeth of steel...

I'am sick of this gynocentric socity

Nihilism is my approach, using it to better and expand my life and perspective. Focusing on my own life instead of living for others by their demands.

Every day the shove border line pornogrphy in your face in places like MTV,The internet and even outside

Hence the goal of progression.

@Iheanacho That's more like egoism, than nihilism lmao

Read Max Stirner

You'd like him lol

Nihilism helps me stand on my own grounds. It helped me see a truth in human nature and life. It helps me question morality and think for myself instead of following a preset of rules handed to me by blue-pilled cucks on a golden platter.

Egotism does not cover morality. A morally righteous person can be egotistical.

I said EGOism

Not egoTISM

An egoist would see morality in the same fashion that you do.

An egoist would see morality as a way to control the individual at his own expense.

i.gyazo.com/0073e4b037e13493d1125bffa119c4a0.png

I think that much of MGTOW would actually like egoism, but since none of them read, they haven't even heard of it lmao

Everything comes from egoeisem

Mgtow Is a self precrvation

Not everything necessarily, but many do rely on it.

In the face of Redical feminisem

Mgtow is the only safe anctuary for man

No its not lmao

there are other ways to avoid societies' pitfalls than going mgtow

Thing is, I am not just "egoistic", I am nihilistic. I really don't see life holding any true meaning by default. I am just making my own meaning to motivate myself to benefit my life. An excuse to stay alive. But a necessary one.

>doesn't see life holding any true meaning
>making one's own meaning is necessary to stay alive

Pick one. You are confusing us.

I pick both. Life has meaning when I MAKE meaning.

Life purpose is not handed to me automatically.

I must manually create it.

When you suggested that life has no true meaning, yet all of the sudden it does based upon nothing more than "because I say so" you are confusing me.

Does you declaring that life has true meaning necessitate that it does?