It was not prohibited by the feds

and in the UK, women could vote as early as men could (excluding knights under late feudalism)

provided they fulfilled the same requirements as men had to fulfill to vote - with the exception of the draft, of course

meaning property

But as for voting and how it matters

Men are primed to defend women. They dont need their votes, they just needed to talk to men, espacialy politicians

in fact back in the day, women recognised that.

"If we make it known and clear that we dont like our men drinking, they wont". Well, they did one better than just not having them drink, they ammended the constitution

Welp, manginas will mangina.

Just like in islamcic cultures.. Well, in the west they only take down beach body ready ads and grid girls.Over there, they wont have any more attractive women distract their men

Conveniently, with women wanting the very best of men, they can all share the top 25% in theory

Do you think the various waves of feminism have changed the mass manginism in modern man, to a point of not bending to vagina will in the case of female voting powers being revoked? Do tell, do tell, good sah 🧐

To a degree, id argue the internet was probably a big factor, too

Now you dont see your uncles mistreatment alone, you see its common.

HA! **so then**..... it could be that taking voting rights away, with the vastly awakened generation of man in play, could prove highly productive in our plight for social and vaginal freedoms.

Do you concur, good sir? 🧐

i would argue, actualy, that the modern west is the best place and time (as of yet) to be a man. Yes it still sucks in many regards, but mostly you are volunteering, you arent practicly forced into marrying someone anymore

And, while feminists present, say, coverture, as misogynistic, yes it meant women couldnt get a credit card without a male cosigner - becouse they couldnt be held accountable for debts

In fact, men went to prison for crimes of their wives as they are responsible

espacialy in the UK this was big with husbands of suffrogettes.

Well, I would agree that it is the best time to be alive no doubt.

Though, the argument for men is in fact debatable.

You see, their husbands were required to pay the taxes on property and income of their wives. BUT there were laws protecting her from having to reveal the info needed to calculate taxes to her husband

If you go mgtow it is

so they had their husbands not paying taxes and going to jail for it

@Redneo my dude where did you get those typing speeds

Anyway yea it's the best place to be mgtow

20 years of experience

@Redneo what say you to the regard of false child support claims going “ham” on men, with an essential debters prison being enforced in current day by the government?

🧐

Used to bein software development for a while till my disabilities hit and it took years for my doctors to recognise whats up. Well, actualy, after the tests i demanded i ended up having to tell them the likely cause. They gave me the drug and oh wonder, it worked

Well arent you a smart cookie

@shadowlessnexus he asked

I'm just being a jackass

@MufflePuff that is a concern

@MufflePuff i know in texas its real roughwith that

Thoughts on single male politicians these days?

becouse he can do a paternity test. But he still owes child support till the date of the test

Open a door for a woman, she claims child support, you can’t pay, you go jail.

potentialy backpay for years

Lol