Message from @Justinian

Discord ID: 532022193069096982


2019-01-08 02:18:50 UTC  

I can’t wait for the collapse only because it is when new civilisations will@rise from its ashes

2019-01-08 02:19:47 UTC  

And only the top 30% of humans will survive which will be only the smartest men, and the most attractive women

2019-01-08 02:19:56 UTC  

I doubt u'll njoy the 30-70% pop drop that usually accompanies a civ failure...

2019-01-08 02:20:11 UTC  

Yeh I know

2019-01-08 02:20:57 UTC  

I’m probs I. That pool of people too, but progress is something nice to think about and it’s the only way I see it happening

2019-01-08 02:21:12 UTC  

that drop is mostly men n boys as well so don't expect n easy ride...

2019-01-08 02:21:19 UTC  

Yep

2019-01-08 02:21:25 UTC  

lots of good men die too

2019-01-08 02:21:30 UTC  

*people

2019-01-08 02:21:35 UTC  

Yep only the best will be left

2019-01-08 02:21:48 UTC  

hopefully

2019-01-08 02:21:49 UTC  

Meanwhile any half decent looking girl gets a free pass

2019-01-08 02:22:30 UTC  

at least the makeup lie will b gone for awhile😉

2019-01-08 02:22:59 UTC  

Fact is, the west has already failed, people just don't know it yet. Just like the last century of the Roman Empire and others before it. Will we see some ups and several more downs sure, but it's already over. Not to sound negative, history just proves this, there's no way around it. We're definitely living in the decline. Enjoy it as much as possible.

2019-01-08 02:23:55 UTC  

scroll up guy... we been yakkin bout thaat over n hr now😄

2019-01-08 02:24:02 UTC  

Lol

2019-01-08 02:24:03 UTC  

oh lol

2019-01-08 02:24:24 UTC  

The only way it could be reversed is a realisation among everyone at the same time

2019-01-08 02:24:33 UTC  

But women won’t go through that

2019-01-08 02:24:56 UTC  

Men are but gynecentrism has already ensured our collapse

2019-01-08 02:26:15 UTC  

Well, you need to red pill enough men. While we do have the internet now and other tech other civs didnt have, it doesn't really preclude a collapse as "most" people think. People I talk to always think it won't happen to us because of our tech, but that's what every civ before us thought as well. Each of those empires were the most powerful and most advanced at its time.

2019-01-08 02:26:17 UTC  

i've written a book on the subject m thinkin of modifying for this w/mb some collaberation.... mb i'll try to find the old manuscript tommorrow...

2019-01-08 02:27:29 UTC  

tech won't stop it... all tech has done regarding the cycle is somewhat replace slavery...

2019-01-08 02:27:43 UTC  

Lol

2019-01-08 02:28:38 UTC  

Hopefully the next cycle will produce the artificial womb in time so they can be liberated from them before the gynecentrism takes it toll on them

2019-01-08 02:30:09 UTC  

u need 4 basic elements to affect the 4 basic human behaviours and alter the 4 basic reproductive drivers

2019-01-08 02:30:39 UTC  

that might stop the cycle

2019-01-08 02:31:36 UTC  

@ziyauren Exactly. Problem is people always think: we have this thing they don't have: be it drones, satellites, advanced weaponry, but people don't realize those things have little to do with preventing a collapse. It has more to do with internal factors which can be exploited by external factors, but even that's not absolutely necessary.
My personal theory is that the reason we keep failing as civilizations and why history is cyclical is that we're limited by our DNA from a macro perspective. That's why i believe transhumanism is the only real permanent solution.

2019-01-08 02:33:23 UTC  

your 4 basic human behaviours r survival, reproduction, social advancement, and hope... all human endeavor is based in one or more of these behaviours

2019-01-08 02:34:32 UTC  

the four basic reproductive factors r the hypergamous/dominance instincts and the r and k reproductive strategies

2019-01-08 02:36:01 UTC  

the four elements that could alter these r life extension, removing women as reproductive gatekeepers, automation, and extraterrestrial resource acquisition...

2019-01-08 02:36:44 UTC  

yo this hearts my bran ~~yo~~

2019-01-08 02:37:48 UTC  

sry... its not a light subject and i have studied it for 50yrs n the best i can do is start a conversation about it...lol

2019-01-08 02:39:20 UTC  

i doubt we can do enuff about it to avert the completion of this cycle...

2019-01-08 02:40:34 UTC  

Problem is our current state of biodiversity leads to the current situation (as it's always been) so there always be more "losers" than "winners". People can be losers because of economic reasons etc. of cource, but genes do play a huge role. If we could make people more capable by DNA alterations, maybe we can escape the cycle, but aside from that I don't think we can escape the cycle. Diversity in DNA will always leads there to be inequality in iq/skill and from I can see from history, "losers" always outbreed "winner", which always is the reason civs collapse eventually.
So without altering DNA, I don't think we can escape the cycle, no matter where we go, the tech we have or which policies we implement.

2019-01-08 02:41:27 UTC  

altering dna has too many unknowns.... we prolly need to work w/what we have

2019-01-08 02:42:31 UTC  

god i sound like tyrel n bladerunner talkin to roy now...lol

2019-01-08 02:42:45 UTC  

@ziyauren Haha.

2019-01-08 02:43:12 UTC  

No Justin, winner can outbreed losers, the problem is civilisations keep creating environment where losers can breed more, like modern day with welfare, if a country implemented a system of a parents requiring a licence to have a kid, then losers wouldn’t be able to reproduce as much and it’ll be like nature when loser just die out and winners breed

2019-01-08 02:45:12 UTC  

the problem is as much in dominance as it is n hypergamy... the natural extreme of hypergamy is gynocentrism and the natural extreme of dominance is statism.... right bak to the ying n yang again😩

2019-01-08 02:45:42 UTC  

@VenomousHawk86 Nah, you have to zoom out more, a more macro historical perspective. Because of our biodiversity, there will always be some "revolutionary" or people who believe what they consider "equality". History shows it's always been this way. Even if you create a system as you suggest, it's inevitable there will be some people somewhere in some time that considers your point of view "unacceptable".