Message from @Eris

Discord ID: 601266269873897503


2019-07-18 03:55:14 UTC  

it's the right to bear arms at a scale capable of fighting the government, whatever that happens to be

2019-07-18 03:55:14 UTC  

you're the biggest the right here

2019-07-18 04:01:27 UTC  

It's a Library.

2019-07-18 04:01:27 UTC  

ur a library

2019-07-18 04:01:32 UTC  

ayy

2019-07-18 04:01:32 UTC  

lmao

2019-07-18 04:02:01 UTC  

"Joint Evaluated Fission and Fusion File" JEFF

2019-07-18 04:03:19 UTC  

Science.

2019-07-18 04:14:13 UTC  

@Eris thats whats called "interpretation"

2019-07-18 04:14:39 UTC  

if the 2A doesnt explicitly state that is or isnt allowed, then that means thats up to interpretation by the Supreme Court

2019-07-18 04:15:48 UTC  

also your words goes against what you say

2019-07-18 04:15:58 UTC  

"well regulated" would imply that guns be regulated lmfao

2019-07-18 04:16:13 UTC  

so that proves that its not against the 2A to have gun regulations

2019-07-18 04:16:21 UTC  

"well regulated"

2019-07-18 04:16:26 UTC  

means

2019-07-18 04:16:29 UTC  

in good working order

2019-07-18 04:16:32 UTC  

well equipped

2019-07-18 04:17:04 UTC  

to regulate means to have rules in place

2019-07-18 04:17:29 UTC  

in accord with regular standards

2019-07-18 04:17:31 UTC  

it's the same meaning as how soldiers with standard equipment were called "regulars"

2019-07-18 04:17:31 UTC  

you're the biggest the same here

2019-07-18 04:17:46 UTC  

my point is however, that the 2A doesnt explicitly state what guns or how many are allowed

2019-07-18 04:17:46 UTC  

nobody wants to hear about your point.

2019-07-18 04:17:53 UTC  

thats up to the supreme court to decide

2019-07-18 04:19:04 UTC  

this is an uncontroversial and well known subject of constitutional understanding

2019-07-18 04:19:12 UTC  

the meaning of well regulated is not ambiguous or unclear

2019-07-18 04:19:42 UTC  

it does not mean having limiting regulations

2019-07-18 04:19:54 UTC  

it means pretty much the exact opposite

2019-07-18 04:26:10 UTC  

yeah the Jeff thing was a joke. thx for looking it up, it was supposed to be funny.

2019-07-18 04:31:11 UTC  

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7253545/Female-college-student-designs-chair-blocks-manspreading.html


"chair physically prevents men from taking up too much space and 'manspreading' by forcing their knees together. The female chair, pictured left, allows woman extra space and to sit more comfortably" ..........

2019-07-18 04:31:25 UTC  

retarded

2019-07-18 04:32:28 UTC  

ye women def need more comfort than men... not the same, not less... more.. sure...

2019-07-18 04:32:54 UTC  

plz kill me

2019-07-18 04:33:00 UTC  

preferably w ur legs

2019-07-18 04:34:04 UTC  

smug woman makes bad "art" so she can be smug

2019-07-18 04:39:28 UTC  

@Deleted User @Eris imagine if a man made that same "womens chair" which forces womens legs open

2019-07-18 04:39:31 UTC  

imagine the outrage

2019-07-18 04:39:31 UTC  

imagine if your dad wore a rubber