Message from @㊀㊁㊂㊃㊄㊅㊆㊇㊈㊉
Discord ID: 601265446649462789
This sounds so dumb only an intellectual could believe this
<@&489004457007513601> woofer pics now pls
Well if we examine the context of the 2nd amendment related to the writers of the constitution and their other statements then we can determine what they meant without being disingenuous.
Anyways, a guy a named Jeff owns nuclear weapons.
Jeff did not come to abolish the 2nd Amendment, he came to fulfill it.
she wont bean me if i suck her pp?
bring it on!
@㊀㊁㊂㊃㊄㊅㊆㊇㊈㊉ it literally does say what kind of arms, how many, etc
that's what "well regulated" means
2A is not just the right to bear arms "haha knives xd"
it's the right to bear arms at a scale capable of fighting the government, whatever that happens to be
you're the biggest the right here
It's a Library.
ur a library
ayy
lmao
"Joint Evaluated Fission and Fusion File" JEFF
Science.
if the 2A doesnt explicitly state that is or isnt allowed, then that means thats up to interpretation by the Supreme Court
also your words goes against what you say
"well regulated" would imply that guns be regulated lmfao
so that proves that its not against the 2A to have gun regulations
"well regulated"
means
in good working order
well equipped
to regulate means to have rules in place
in accord with regular standards
it's the same meaning as how soldiers with standard equipment were called "regulars"
you're the biggest the same here
my point is however, that the 2A doesnt explicitly state what guns or how many are allowed
nobody wants to hear about your point.
thats up to the supreme court to decide
this is an uncontroversial and well known subject of constitutional understanding
the meaning of well regulated is not ambiguous or unclear
it does not mean having limiting regulations