I would deny the traitor his action or his will.

Define the traitor? Is he a tyrant?

If it violates other peoples rights, then yes. And I would not hesitate to oppose his actions and will within the confines of my rights if I thought his will was detrimental to soiciety.

That is all that matters. Those who wish to cause more strife for their benefit.

They will meet an iron hammer.

Then you are good.

they can catch dis iron dick

Though i take issue with the rapidity to which you jump to force and blood so readily

Such things smack of tyranny

Threats to the peace of the people will be removed.

Indeed

By words or force or blood

As it proceeds thence

To be decisive and unmerciful to ones enemies is not to be a tyrant, but to be wise.

Your only enemy is the tyrant

If the tyrant will not be disuaded by words

He will be disuaded by force

I disagree burnside. There are things other than tyranny that are a threat to humanity.

Subversion. Selfish ambition at a disreguard for others.

And should force thereby fail the tyrant only receives blood

That is tyranny

Those who willingly serve the tyrants, would you call them tyrants as well?

Robbing a man of the fruits of his action is the same as denying him action

It is tyranny plain and simple

A progressive SJW teacher who indocrtinates her students is not a tyrant, but she is a threat to society.

G night.

night

She is a traitor who serves the tyrant.

To aid a tyrant is join then in subordinating others, they then become tyrants

Do you understand the extent to which all modern men are caught in a terrible web of tyranny?

I don't know how you can simplify speaking your opinion as tyranny.

To subvert the will is to deny its fullness that teacher is a tyrant

This web is a sickly metaxis.

It is a simple matter, the application renders it complex, though the solutions remain simple enough

and now i work

As much as some braindead actor or singer spouting SJW nonsense is harmfull to society, stupid people saying stupid things is part of a free society.

Speaking freely does not necessarily subvert the will of others

Darty, I would call it the spirit of tyranny.

I don't know. I guess I have always viewed tyranny as control that an individual cannot escape, as opposed to control that is given power from the individuals own idiocy.

Those who wish to deny man his action are traitors, those who do are tyrants.