Message from @UnScottable
Discord ID: 684117816902680758
You just defeated your own argument
Half of hate crimes are Blacks and Hispanics attacking each other. Even though they are minorities in the USA. Just this simple fact alone tells you that having a majority of blacks in the US as compared to having the Majority of the population be whites. That violent crime would increase.
So? Just arrest them, that would be enough to isolate them from the rest of society, same as the white Criminals.
also who said I want a 100% racially homogenous America. You just make stuff up and put words into my mouth this whole time so we are done here.
You want to be around more white people than people of other races, but yet your reasoning for it is bad
Again, you are deflecting again, and not addressing my point that the same solution would work for non-whites, just making a strawman and saying "Well I didn't say this *exactly*", like, alright, but the same principle still stands.
No it doesnt. Because wanting a 100% racially homogenous America is different then the stuff I say. And you say that I would exclude nonwhite people. So you are just wrong and mischaracterizing my points. As usual.
Never did I use the term 100%, etheir, again, you're just straw-manning
Saying that I want to exclude people is also straw-manning me. Saying that I would exclude people implies that basically the goal is a 100% homogenous society eventually. After continual exclusion this would be the result.
> Never did I use the term 100%, etheir, again, you're just straw-manning
Strawmaning and missing the point is all you have done.
But here are some quotes
-"well then im not a racist because i dont think whites are inherently superior. i just prefer to be around my own people. but also the term is useless and should be rejected"
-"the founding fathers understood this and were ethnic nationalists themselves. This is why the first naturalization act only gave citizenship to white men of good moral character."
-"maybe its actually immoral to not prefer your own kind and to not want to aid your own genetic stock in continuing. As that is literally inversing the point of the reproductive cycle on its head lol. For dumb illusory reasons that are founded in an ideology that is not based on reality."
I dont see where I said that I would exclude people.
Yes, you want to exclude people and primarily have a society made up of people genetically similiar to you, like the founding fathers etc.
That's the entire idea; now you're just being obtuse
I said the founding fathers excluded people and perhaps that isnt immoral. But I never said _I_ would exclude people. Read more carefully dude.
Yes, you didn't use the exact words and now are backpedalling xD
The same thing every time
also during the time of the first naturalization act the population was 10% black. so even the founding fathers didnt want it to be 100%. Again you are entirely missing the point and trying to characterize me as some kind of hitler or something.
Well that just proves your point wrong, not that you didn't make it
the blacks didnt have voting rights but they were still here. so no it does not disprove my point. As they could not influence politics.
I will however say this, I do think that if the founding fathers saw the shit-show that allowing a different sub-species to come to the homeland causes. They might have reconsidered the slaves entirely or at least made it so that they couldnt breed.
You prefer the presence of white people and consider them your community even if it's detrimental to you, while preferring not to be around various minorities (such as say, asians, despite having lower crime rates, the fear of black people), or establishing solutions (I.E. prison for criminals) that could easily apply to both races. It's all just an excuse.
well actually as i have demonstrated earlier. being around asians and having interracial relations is not beneficial to whites nor the asians
as interracial kids that are white-asian have 2x the likelihood of having a mental illness then just Asian kids
Also due process under the law for criminal matters is a uniquely European concept and thus I would actually strive to preserve that.
> What about the intelligent non-violent black people, you exclude those because of the one's that are? - @everybodydothatdinosaur
Yes. It's not practical to vet people individually. If I have a fuckton of people entering a country, telling all niggers to fuck off and only processing whites and asians severely reduces costs and waiting times.
This demonstrates that in fact, I am not the only one who prefers their own. And in fact whites are the group that prefer their own the least when compared to other groups. However there is another study that was done that showed that whites who are not liberals have a higher in-group preference. So there is that as well. 74% of blacks said that their race is either extremely important or very important to how they think about themselves.
Naturally if you see something as either very important or extremely important to the way you see yourself, this will inform many personal decisions of yours. Including who you hang out with, and etc etc.
White liberals are the weakest race
> So? Just arrest them, that would be enough to isolate them from the rest of society, same as the white Criminals.
Prisons also cost money; incidentally, they cost more than a plane ticket to Whereverthefuck province, Niggerland
Well let's look at liberals. Hey there's a Democrat primary what better contemporary example could we look for? Bernie, the communist, performed well in the first few states which were overwhelmingly white.
But the Democrats can't win without an overwhelming majority of black votes. So in the first primary with a large black electorate they overwhelmingly voted against the communist.
Yes the Democratic Party isn’t a monolith. Failing to channel black or Hispanic senses of nationalism they’ll fail definitely. The dems *should* know this. But whatever, anyway last I checked Ronald Reagan’s “natural conservatives” really liked socialism.
Voter ID should be mandatory nationwide and done via Executive Order as its due to the State of Emergency we are in with the immigration issue.
A lot of whites aren’t against ideas of a social security net or labor unions either.
simple as. Nothing less would be accepted if I was president. <:comfort:592107824826417204>
Really it’s more of the fact that dems don’t have their shit together. They need to realize they left the working class a long time ago.
Blacks and Hispanics are more socially conservative, so they won’t vote for a gay guy. That was a dumb idea
well conservative as it pertains to the LGBT issue Id say.
Tbh focusing on small messages like trumps “America first” wrapped with a ideology is way better. Like it’s easier to say “We’re Russians fuck yeah” than teaching everyone Karl Marx. The dems want to teach everyone Karl Marx instead of “Latino Americans fuck yeah”
Right and put forward a sound vision of what it means to be "America First". like you said, wrapped in the ideology
You got dudes like whats his face... Sebastian Gorka or whatever... his show is called America First but hes a huge ConInc shill.