Message from @Malac
Discord ID: 682383614108893234
The video is removed
@Ashur Zuk'i-Rash No because he's not old enough.
pog
china makes a virus: wignat = ze jewulllsssssss
links dont work in here peeps
@jageur Listen here retard. Jews start everything
For 10-19 years old it's 0.2% CFR, for 20-29 it's 0.2% CFR, for 30-39 it's 0.2% CFR, for 40-49 it's 0.4%. for 50-59 it's 1.3% CFR, for 60-69 it's 3.6% CFR, for 70-79 it's 8% CFR and for 80+ it's 14.8 CFR. CFR means case fatality rate.
The Jews didn't start this discord
<:sarGOY:462286263622303754>
He thinks....
we've been here since the start though 😄
He said he had proof, earlier.
may i ask foxy a question?
Did Foxy just say he had God's backstage pass?
yeh
@Cassiopeia @Edog
I cam here for the explicit reason of disproving your notions about gas emissions in Wuhan
Oh gr8 lol
I understand completely that this being a pseudointellectual server attracts likeminded individuals.
Sulfur dioxide is a rare emission from metazoan organisms. For total emission it requires extensive burning, of which is not taking place in wuhan
Sulphur is commonly bound in sillaceous and metallic compounds, or bound to carbon. It is a trace element within humans.
I’m just wondering why In specifically Wuhan and chongqing there are sulfur dioxide levels exponentially beyond normal according to Windy. I understand that windy may not be the greatest or most relevant data, but if you can give me non biased numbers for it I will reassess the situation.
Simple. Quarantined city requires extra energy. Sulphur is far more abundant within dirty coal or other hydrocarbons alongside steel production.
Micrograms of sulfur dioxide are nothing
The hight projected amount according to windy is 1.8mg per cubic meter
That is around the average amount of argon in the atmosphere
Actually
Scratch that
There is more argon on average over china than there is sulfur dioxide
However, the numbers seen currently in Wuhan and chongqing are beyond the rest of the world by a lot and I’d assume in India and other places without the cleanest power to have a lot more emissions than they do
It does not require clean power
It just means the fuel source has sulfur within it
Hydrocarbon fuel can be sulfur poor as well as sulfur rich
And I assume there is no way to see what kind of fuel the Chinese government is using.
China uses mostly coal fired plants
Well- kind as in, where they got it
Determining the likelihood of sulfur content