Message from @Ryoma Nagare
Discord ID: 667126248203354153
how the show portrays the fall of venezuela as being the fault of toxic male asshole "trump/jhonson/bolsonaro" types instead of socialist scum
This video shuts on and misunderstands starship troopers. Figured you guys would want to watch it.
https://youtu.be/WPven6id2RY
lol ...
like Israel needs to be doing sneaking attacks
I am curious as to the opinions of this group about the full resignation of the Russian government. I do not know how their government worked or have kept track of it. However, I am curious as to peoples opinions.
Ah, I see a vid is already posted on it ^.^
Well article and pic anyway
btw should the United states and Brazilian army overthrow the current socialist regime in Venezuela
no, you'll just get american soldiers killed ... they should build the wall instead
for Brazilians, however ...
<:deus_vult:466354779841495040> <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>
so only the Brazilian army invades Venezuela
So any other Persian here
Zoroastrian or GTFO
they are a socialist cancer that will come to bite them in the ass later
I think what causes so many analyses of the bad guys--whether they be left-wing or right-wing baddies--is that most voices in the media are controlled. Even the somewhat independent ones like Praeger really aren't that independent. We are fed controlled narratives on Right AND Left. It's that Hegelian Dialectic trap.
Like, I could igv eyou 50 things that I consider rank hypocrisy and stupidity right now on "The Right." It's so easy to do that, you see?
and people fall for it, every time.
Both sides collude in their lies about each other, in the controlled media. Acceptable Narratives are crafted, others suppressed. And paid actors are what most of the "activists" you see are.
It took me a while to red pill that hard but honestly, just look: this is what it is. When you are arguing with what you call "The Left' (or "The Right" even) you are arguing with a phantasm created for you by the media. We have to break out of gov't controllec corporate media.
Globally.
Figuring out that we're all being propagandized is step #1.
Behold, the new 007
So far as the James Bond Cinematic universe (as opposed to the novels) 'James Bond' is a code name that is passed from agent to agent. This explains why Bond from *Dr. No* in the 60s can be the hero of *Goldeneye* in '95. Because there's not going to be a septuagenarian action hero.
So Idres Elba who is a brit, which fucks me up because he did a good job as Stringer Bell in *The Wire* could be an appropriate Bond. I cannot see a woman playing as Bond because the character is too masculine.
A female Bond would be retarded though. I don't think a healthy 20 YO woman could be as virile or convincing as an aged Sean Connery.
Bond is intended with an inherent campiness that Lampoon's the stereotypes. Gender swapping kills the satire. Which is the bedrock they need to pull off the story
In the Flemming novels he is pretty cold-blooded. Almost a murderer except that he mostly kills communists who are by definition not human.
Okay, I'm admittedly not a big bond fan. So the campiness might just be a films thing. But it's still very much needs bond to be a man
"So Idres Elba who is a brit"
looks african to me
Sure in either version a female Bond would not make sense. Just that in Fleming's novels Bond was a specific individual while in the movies most consider it a position held by different individuals.....