on constituional grounds

@SuperHeroDeluxe if the government makes a law which violates a clause in the constitution, it is unconstitutional, like making a law favoring one religion over another, that is unconsitutional

that's why i say it doesn't give the government the right to do whatever

The constitution is a box the government dwells in.

if i can demonstrate that their legistlation interferes with my pursuit of happiness, i can challenge it

@SuperHeroDeluxe yes, but no, there have been SC cases which have a foundation for some of those cases

the constitution puts the power on the people, if they don't think that it's a bill of rights for the government, some of you being silly

@SuperHeroDeluxe so the SC has established its interpretation of what is a violation of the clauses or not

not permanently

@SuperHeroDeluxe no the constitution gives the right to make laws to the legislative

that are not claused in the constitution

everything is fair game

sure

@SuperHeroDeluxe you don't have the right to infringe others rights either in Your pursuit of happiness. And the government does have the right to step in and prevent you from doing that

and you have a right to challenge

sure, i agree

im talking about the government's rights

the constitution is everything that the legislative branch is not allowed to make laws about, what the executive is not allowed to enforce on

pretty much everything is covered. it just depends on interpretations of wording. for instance, abortion is fine as long as the babies aren't considered PERSONS

The SC opinion on freedom of speech changed in the early 1900s due to a minority opinion.

if unborn babies were persons, everyone would have to keep their hands off

@SuperHeroDeluxe @Wizard_of_The_West whatever the SC determines is the interpretation is how it goes

not permanently

we have hope

that is why, and let me repost it again, the reason we need:

1) SC constitutional Judges
2) Stop Immigration
3) Harsher Crime Punishments

i have hope

1) is on top

for a reason

Past premises can be challenged

i have hope that the supreme court will clearly define that a fetus is a person

@SuperHeroDeluxe no

Interpretations change over time to be sure

But it's a long time like 100 years

babies can survive at 4 months of gestation now, it's about time we consider them people

@SuperHeroDeluxe you go about the problem so unlike a lawyer, let me give you the best argument forward to make the ruling unconstitutional,

it is the fact that they have no legislative federal law about abortion that would make it ilegal federally, it should be a state issue

if they will ever strike it down, when we get SC justices, this is what they will do

the constitution protects PEOPLE.

make the fetuses PEOPLE and ta-da, it's done

@SuperHeroDeluxe its about the laws!

@SuperHeroDeluxe the SC kills people on death row all the time

@SuperHeroDeluxe leave it at a state right