then private, self-appointed authorities, yeah, fuck that

Right. Mall "cops" are on private property

if they were under police supervision and had to undergo the same type of training they might have an argument for it, but self appointed? nah.

double fuck that regarding religious authority

Yeah, and I wouldn't let Christians get a free pass, no one gets one

even that alabama church that unnaccountably was allowed its own private police I don't think has gotten *patrol permissions*

...

*yet*

fucking exactly

playing favorites with this desert fairytale bullshit leads to trouble, without exception

It's all part of the lefty class,race,gender privilege bullshit

well, class is an actually significant divide, but regardless, don't think republicans haven't pulled this shit in their own respect

aside from the alabama example, it sure as shit wasn't democrats that sent FBI to a fucking college teenager's house over his social media posts regarding Israel

I keep seeing reports of stuff like that in the UK

well, yeah, but social media posts about ANYTHING in the UK aren't safe

this was in AMERICA

and iirc it was while Republicans had both house and senate

both parties are trash and need to be repopulated from the ground u[

up

"re elected"

`Right, my point is no private forces should be wandering around on public property` what about security guards i hire to protect myself @SuperHeroDeluxe

Heh. The "what about" guy. If they're protecting you, they're not wandering around as they please.

There's no chance of security guards trying to enforce Sharia I guess

My point being is the private armed forces should not be patrolling public areas.

So i was just reading about Copernick dissing Thangiving ... this is how the extreme left weakens democracy

Of course not @Hopix . They wouldn't be taking down names and addresses for further action either.

@SuperHeroDeluxe are you against local security teams which help cops by reporting crimes in their communities? watch teams?

they find some aspect of the shared history that can be said to be unjust, and will push it , till they get it their way

in our case , it was a 1980s constitution pushed by Pinochet, although he didn’t actually write it but the best constitutionalists our country had, and despite the constitution was changed and modfied by a socialist president on 2005 , they pushed the fact its a constitution funded on a opression

Security teams don't have the right to determine what is a crime or not. @Brue

same way the UK has people say the empire was the biggest evil of the world

@SuperHeroDeluxe they merly watch crimes, alert people that they may be commiting crimes, and then reporting them to the police if they do not stop, no force is used

@SuperHeroDeluxe the police are the final say

No, judges are

this is true

i should say they do not use violence

This isn't Judge Dredd

Or intimidation

so if theyre unarmed and clearly marked as police with no more authority than ordinary citizen, and only report what could be potentially criminal activity are they ok?

if i see that my neighbors house has someone i do not know walking around the back, im going to approach him, stop him, and ask what he is doing

marked as "mot" police