Message from @Jokerfaic
Discord ID: 651564033115160577
.... electoral college? I was talking about an effective national congress versus a confederation congress
^ True. Not a dog on a confederation congress. Both have their own merit to be honest.
cuz this brue dipshit outright said "I don't want an effective congress"
Did someone say currency?
Fuck let’s go full federal now
Abolish states
though come to think of it, having it be done on a state level at the same time wouldn't be a bad idea
We need a strong currency
...We kind of *already have* one of the strongest currencies
Not to mention one that's recognized by all states
Congress in DC can deliberate on exclusively federal legislation or procedures, and state legislatures can do the same for their own jurisdictions
then it truly is a "national review day"
Honestly once a federal law is contradicted by the majority of states, the law should immediately come to a vote by state senators
I.E. Marijuana laws and similar legislation
or maybe to not clutter everything up, lets name a national review month. the beginning of the month, states hand their constituants a census for the state legislature, then a week later, one for the national legislature
Fuck those are some *optimistic* timelines
I want an even stronger currency
no, the census is to pick one act or law for that legislature to then spend an entire 24 hours reviewing
to be held at a much later date in the month
If you want a stronger currency, you need another war
Look at America's GDP during WWI and WWII
It's that or open a completely free market.
or actually bring jobs to the midwest
instead of completely lying about punishing those who send them away
people don't seem to understand, the equipment, facilities, shipping yards, factories, warehouses, those didn't fucking disappear
@Mersenne war is not good for the economy. It's an extrapolation of the Broken Window Fallacy
the jobs, as in physical tasks, are still all here
the only thing that's changed is who some dickhead in a suit is paying for it and where
@Benjamin Henry - That's a solid point. War is the catalyst for industrial revolution, albeit conflict must directly benefit the host nation for long-term yields.
But the increase in production will never reach a break-even point with peaceful expansion
Because stuff gets broken, and has to be repaired before any gains can be made
produce, export, deal, rinse, repeat
contrarywise, locate a product you need, observe how others import it and from who, observe the greatest supply at the closest range, find something they want that you have, deal, rinse, repeat
if you don't have it, find someone who does, deal, etc, etc
That's under the assumption that peaceful expansion is equally expeditious in it's development. The money contributing to repairs would have been invested in the economy regardless. War, while a plague on humanity, drives the rapid development of nations
then bam, suddenly you have the global marketplace
To be fair, unchecked growth results in collapse. The USSR being a great example of this.
and the past and current bubbles
observe the signs, corporations are already buying back their own stocks in broad daylight to artificially inflate the value
beware fake growth, its a very real cancer