he even said it was the first step

No no no, not EQUITY

We all have the opportunities, we're all set

listen, some people are going to have better opportunties than others, there will never be equal opportunity, there will be kids born to the rich that get better, kids who are born to the poor who cant, even if there is redistribution, they wont have the same

No socialism needed.

socialism is required, redistribution is required for equal oppertunity

it is a socialistic idea

egalitarian at heart

Oh, no, I'm not into Cosmic justice like that

i, being rich, will always hire better tutors, and better schools for my son to go to , there will be no chance for the poor to ever have the same opportunity as my kids

No, everyone can get an education, they have smartphones diet cheap

the only way to have equal oppurtunity is to force my kids to not be able to have those advantages

..... smartphone education....?

I just signed up for a Constitution course at Hillsdale college, free

ah, I see

@Jokerfaic. Fuck yeah, I have thousands of books

there will never be equal opportunity, i will hire person teachers for my kids

they will have better advantages from there

equal opportunity is a pipe dream just as equal outcomes are like the wage gap

egalitarianism in all forms is anti natural

You're mistaking my viewpoint. There is equal opportunity for people who make the effort to seek it

that being said, you can still be for increasing the ability for the poor to have free education, but you cannot say equal opportunity, that is a pipe dream, page 300 in part 2 of DAS KAPITAL by marx

NOT some sort of Cosmic justice trying to even things out.

equal opportunity is how the socialists start

There is equal opportunity. They can stop playing Candy Crush Saga for a few hours and learn stuff

opportunity and availability are different things you know this right?

Anyone who has a smartphone has access to more learning materials than ANYONE had 100 years ago

Anything I want to know, I can start learning about in minutes

there is information available but there is not the same opportunity from it, someone who is taught one on one from a doctorate in law will have a better opportunity than one who watches videos only

thats a true statement what you just said, but that does not change

How the hack do you measure BETTER?

PewDiePie makes more than most lawyers

literature has shown that smaller class sizes increase the information retention of students and maximize with one on one

The vast majority of them.

Ok, so how did their wisdom compare?

the worst is when it is just youtube videos or books on their own

WISDOM? how the hack do you measure WISDOM

to quote someone

;P

Exactly. You're talking about interpretive studies

one would assume that better information retention with one on one compared to those just with youtube videos would not provide the same opportunity