and even when we were teaching them they were also watched by a guardian angel (a soldier with a gun made ready) so if they did anything percieved as threatening they caught a bullet
these attacks on our home bases is showing alot of flaws with the systems we have, were i runing a base your sidearm would be part of your uniform, it better be in it's holster and ready to rock else you will be getting some KP.
That's a different task my guy (training local militia that is) usually we use Green Berets for that. What we do at the academies is more for command-level integration.
Sure this looks like a colossal fuckup. Wondering how the fuck he ended up with a live weapon at a flight school. Military restrictions on arm on base are fairly strict. I was speaking to the general policy of training foreign officers which has some pretty valid reasons.
Exactly, they're strict enough. You can screen these fucking jihadi cunts as much as you like, they'll perform the duty of their god one way or another
It's fucking galling to me anyone would suggest that its our military regs that need to change, rather than our relationship to the number one jihadi kingdom, in the face of clear and present terrorism
These incidents happen. More servicemembers die each week from alcohol, training, and general-life related events. The system's pretty straightforward, can't do much about the occasional extremist
Obama's push for gender equity - compromising the standards of infantry training to ensure 1 or 2 females enter a unit - along with co-ed boot camp practices - did more damage on military readiness than any of the random jihadi's going postal on their base.
