Holy shit, you'

I believe you're likely a hypocrite and would not respect a UN ruling just like I don't if it was against something you supported

You're creating fiction that just cannot ever happen in reality and presenting that as an argument.

Are you not capable of playing out a situation in your mind?

What is that called again

there is a mental disability where people lack imagination as part of it

I'm not going to give credence to a hypothetical that so stupid, so childish, so idiotic, and unrealistic.

Kind of ridiculous considering its not about whether it would happen or not but about the underlying hypocrisy and double standards.

It's like trying to argue physics and saying "imagine if gravity didn't exist, and this scenario happens."

Fuck off. What nonsense.

"I can't tell you what I would think in this situation"

are you a brainlet

The situation can never happen.

Ever

It doesn't matter lmao

It does, fuck face. You're equivocating the status of a high-profile terrorist with the POTUS.

If you asked me "What would you think if Iran became a White ethnostate" I would be able to answer the question despite it not being something that would ever happen.

"high profile terrorist" hahahahaha

I wouldn't ask such a stupid question.

That has nothing to do with what I said

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrwbDRghx6g

Nah. You're presenting another scenario that won't happen in order to make an argument. I really don't care for fiction.

Something doesn't have to happen for you to give an answer to it, that is the point of hypotheticals and metaphors.

you argue

talmudically

you slip around rather than answering a question

You're attempting to dismiss the importance of QS' travel ban by putting up this dumb and impossible hypothetical. No, that doesn't work.

You remember Trump campaigning said he wanted to abolish the UN right? He railed against nations having to adhere to their rules. I'm literally doing the same, lmao.

>Talmudically
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

I kept thinking of the jelly quote

```The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. They had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.```

What needs to be asked is (((Why))) does everyone in the ME hate us

The US has the clout to dismiss things it doesn't like. Not a high-profile terrorist. Certainly, QS' travel ban is something the US supports.

"The US is right because its the US" is retarded

I thought you were trying to pit yourself as intelligent

Well, one is inclined to think the State is in the right

It depends on the state

That’s part of being a Citizen

Yeah, I'm not in the habit of equivocating the US, or really the vast majority of countries in the world, with terrorists.

Unfortunately the US has a track record of making retarded decisions

*Cough Cough Qadaffi*
*Cough Cough Suddam*