https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrwbDRghx6g

Nah. You're presenting another scenario that won't happen in order to make an argument. I really don't care for fiction.

Something doesn't have to happen for you to give an answer to it, that is the point of hypotheticals and metaphors.

you argue

talmudically

you slip around rather than answering a question

You're attempting to dismiss the importance of QS' travel ban by putting up this dumb and impossible hypothetical. No, that doesn't work.

You remember Trump campaigning said he wanted to abolish the UN right? He railed against nations having to adhere to their rules. I'm literally doing the same, lmao.

>Talmudically
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

I kept thinking of the jelly quote

```The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. They had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.```

What needs to be asked is (((Why))) does everyone in the ME hate us

The US has the clout to dismiss things it doesn't like. Not a high-profile terrorist. Certainly, QS' travel ban is something the US supports.

"The US is right because its the US" is retarded

I thought you were trying to pit yourself as intelligent

Well, one is inclined to think the State is in the right

It depends on the state

That’s part of being a Citizen

Yeah, I'm not in the habit of equivocating the US, or really the vast majority of countries in the world, with terrorists.

Unfortunately the US has a track record of making retarded decisions

*Cough Cough Qadaffi*
*Cough Cough Suddam*

The US is not currently in the interests of its citizenry, its an occupied government for elite interests

occupied

government

tard

How much has 115th/16th Congress Actually gotten done?

@Lidomite You can keep trying to pretend he is a terrorist, but he was a commander of the military of a real nation. He wasn't a "terrorist". That is just a Zionist talking point.

>Inb4 muh Tax Cuts

Denying he is a terrorist is a terrorist sympathizer's talking point.

We don’t recognize the IRG or Qods as legitimate Militaries

You're writing a lot but saying nothing @Lidomite

Explain to me why I'm wrong

Fuck off. You've not bothered explaining anything and just spouting opinions as if they're fact.

What do you want to know

Soleimani lead the attack on our embassy and his troops murdered over 1000 protestors and then took the bodies so that the total number of deaths cant be counted

soleimani was an asshole. but... that doesnt mean my tax dollars should go to taking him out... lol doesnt israel have some missiles they can throw around?

From you? Not much, tbh. You're just filled with uninteresting conspiracies.

@UnScottable Obama stopped Israel from killing him.

So, they could've done it. They wanted to do it.

@UnScottable Links?

like from the Iranian side