People who use the word "hate" as an object noun are invariably creating more hate than they address.

I am forced to disagree. That's a silly parameter

If you're trying to tackle "hate" you're not doing anything productive, you'll just polarize people further away from you because they don't understand.

"Hate" is never given a justification, so they see the reaction to evil as a sin.

Instead of, you know, the evil itself.

I agree its a fruitless endeavor, but simply endeavoring at all isn't automatically a certain negative

its a waste of their time, but not much more unless they take it too far

Pushing a wood splinter further into your skin is not going to get rid of the splinter. You have to pull it out to remove it. There is a right and wrong way to go about dealing with an aggravating problem.

I refuse to believe you don't see how silly that comparison is

Pushing it further in may cause it to become submerged, and not drag or catch anymore, but the risk of infection is too high.

by acknowledging that "hate" as an individual concept can't be quantified or coherently adressed, you've already annulled this binary example

again, a silly comparison

Wanting to kill people is not natural default state.

No, it isn't, which was one of my points as well

If you're going to accuse someone of homicidal tendencies towards a certain group, you have to ask why.

And I already said homophobia varies by degrees. what I also said was I can't really think of any significant anti-gay sentiment that doesn't directly imply negative intent

besides not wanting to marry a homosexual

Hate is a Relative term

by that of course I mean, an individual not wanting to marry another individual

yes it is

For instance, Christians can refer to Satanists as Hateful

more often you hear it about atheists

Now, I find them Antagonistic retards, but they aren’t really hateful

or *from* atheists toward religious

Stating that two homosexual men cannot reproduce is not hateful

nope

its not anti-gay either

But given the relativity, there is someone who finds that Statement Hateful

Usually it stems from saying “I’m Christian and I don’t agree with Same-Sex Marriage”

It’s not that I want to kill them or for them to be dead, I personally find it repulsive, but their private life is none of my business

well stating biological fact and saying "I'm repulsed that these two would marry" aren't exactly synonymous

and conjoining them in context would imply mentioning the inability to reproduce as a weak excuse to support the negative attitude

however the sentiment of "its none of my business" puts the matter to rest

It’s not the Marriage itself, it’s the Activities

I guess the better way of saying it is I find Homosexual Sex Repulsive and Unnatural

That includes PeePee in the Pooper

Regardless of Orientation

The thing is tho that is isn’t unnatural, we have seen homosexual action in many animals

yea animals tend to hump anything and everything

To be specific we've seen *bisexual* behavior in many species. The sort of exclusive homosexual pair bonding in our species is fairly unique. Male-male sex acts in other primates are usually dominance displays sort of like prison sex. Even avians that form 'lesbian' pair bonds *raise young* which is not possible without some hetro behaviors.

Not that that validates or invalidates anything they call it 'the naturalistic fallacy' for a reason.