you literally pitched a fucking fit because they had one criticism of century old economic theory

I don't remember what it was exactly, that's why i was gonna go back and relisten to it.
I know something they said had upset me at the time and i don't remember what it was.

what, they're not open and honest enough about the clear negative consequences of socialism for you?

"I don't remember what it was exactly"

could have been a single thing i took out of context, might have been several things that all added up.
I don't remember, but I don't care enough to go back and check now.

it's nearly an hour of listening to something and i don't want to spend that time.

christ, "I don't like the new narrator" would have been a more substancial complaint

one I would have agreed with

I liked the first one more

the diffrence of narrator didn't really bother me at all.

it was a little jarring, bt got used to him

also the addition of a cat helped

Don't mean to jump in on this, but @Jokerfaic is being kind of a whiny bitch in this conversation

It really wouldn't have gotten to me if his complaint wasn't built on fucking air

I mean it's a personall reason, so it doesn't need to be build on anything other then what i say it needs to be.

likely its built on several things includeing how i was feeling at the time about the topics touched on.

your original claim was that they just threw free market capitalism under the bus and blamed it for the Irish famine, that's just not true

Dude, @ARockRaider totally said he'd go back over the material and see if he still felt the same way about it

That's pretty generous

"ARockRaiderToday at 10:28 PM
was their irish famen one that made me stop trusting them.
they wanted to say that somehow it was free markets that caused said famen."

that's what i said at first, and yes that does sound a bit to much like that was the only reason i stopped trusting them.

but i have cleared that up in that there are several reasons all kind of interlaced INCLUDEING how they handle their extra credits series.

tbh I'm not interested in what you do or don't trust, I'm just saying their histories are, so far, objective, and your refutation was based on a claim that just isn't true

and I dissagree.

and now we are right back to where we started only i have been more clear then I was at the first.

motherfucker I just listened to the section where they brought up free market economics in my car

oh, that and now i'm NOT willing to go back and try and find my reasoning.

why must you cuss at me?

because you're being a mealymouthed fucking contrarian bitch. You're literally founding your refutation on a fabrication

taking the dissenting side of the argument just because its fucking there

@Jokerfaic you're just being impatient

It's not like we're under some sort of deadline here

i'm founding my dislike of said group on several things and i have clearified that the pice i bought up was just a pice, likely the last pice that pushed me over the edge of not likeing them.

a last piece, again, which was false

there's no two ways about it, your claim was just innaccurate

if you had just waited back when i first said i was gonna go back and listen i would have had all of the stuff that had made me upset with them, so now you are just cussing at me for not likeing some random youtuber who you yourself admit have a bias in a large section of their work.

and now i'm not even really interested in going back to remember it anyway.

except I can articulate my concerns and not couch them in melodramatic language like "I don't *trust* them anymore"

that's not melodramatic at all, I don't trust them to give me the info like it is.
and for whatever reason that is that's still how i feel.

based on an example which is false

@ARockRaider actually has a legal basis for the argument he's making: "falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus"