Message from @Death in June
Discord ID: 673465459659767833
sure, it's not a direct thing, how the often deal with it is just not spend that money on the other things they would spend it on.
do you know why it seem like everywhere is always understaffed but still not paying well?
because it cost so much just to hire someone! and if that person doesn't work out all that money is wasted.
i'm sure every employer would love nothing more then just paying everyone an hourly wage and have half again the people they need on staff, and i'm sure the employees would love that as well! because they wouldn't always be working right to the wire on everything.
and half of the "they don't pay the taxes" are things like setting up their HQ somewhere so they save on registration costs.
I worked for a place where they had their on paper HQ in another state so they could have all the trucks registration in those states, this office had 4 people in it.
the real main office had something like 15 or 20.
that's how they "get around taxes" they are playing WELL inside the rules.
and what is more important to you? taxing the profit out of an employer or then being able to hire more people? what do you think would be better for the poor?
i mean to be fair i don't necessarily know if corporate taxes are good, however i would prefer to just change the way investment and ownership is handled
I can agree with you that big corp is bad, but guess what big corp takes care of itself!
i would just prefer to have most investment into large enterprises be state directed
if left alone a big corp once it over grows itself will just die and be picked apart by other smaller groups.
please point me to a government run program that does it's job well with out cost over runs.
with a mandated share of capital stock for a labor organization representing labor within the firm holding at least as much as the conventional stock held by private proprietors
"that does it's job well with out cost over runs"
what do you mean by that
how about a road department that has good roads with out being over budget?
a brige that was built early and cheaper the was quoted while being better then promised?
well again i would say that liberal governments are inefficient by design
so why do you want the governments running things?
and corporations here would not be equivalent to the sort of government programs you're talking about
not gonna happen, the government has no REASON to be more efficient.
we could start by scrapping congress and replacing the president with an elected monarch
would you be ok when Trump gets elected to that spot?
or would you whine about him being all powerfull?
certainly not my first choice but i'd take it
sure, well about half of the US wouldn't, they couldn't even take him for 4 years being the president.
sure and that's part of the problem with the system
so let me ask you something, because we aint getting anywhere here.
why does the owner of a bussness owe it to their employees?
they owe it to the nation
so lets say I own a transport truck that i bought by saveing up my own money, and I deside insted of driveing it myself i'm gonna hire someone to drive it.
why should that hireling get ownership of the truck I bought myself?
because that is what you are saying, just on a larger scale.
how about a chair factroy? I started out just building the chairs myself but i bought better tools and now demand is outstriping my abilty to build the chairs so I hire someone.
why should they own part of my workshop?
how do i contact a mod?
would a mod be able to jump into the long walls pls
no idea, not here.
@Kingy200 is unable to access the us politics and either has his rank bugged or banned for no reason, so if a mod could msg him that would be appriciated
thank you - the chef
hmm... best i can offer is "check the rules for advice"
@ARockRaider depends on how much you own
why does it matter how much I own? why should I be forced to give my equpment to people i just hired?