When you're free, then you're also free to own stuff

they have a monopoly on the goods in their store

They have the freedom to fight back.

You can claim ownership because you're free, if you couldn't claim ownership of anything that would make you less free.

so it makes you less free to not be able to have an authority back up your exclusive claim to a particular object

Of course they would have a monopoly on the good in their store, they own it

You're trolling me DiJ, I'm done

i'm not trolling

Yes you are

Not on purpose perhaps, but you are trolling

You can't live in a truly free world and claim ownership because you are taking away people's right to that item.

no

you are relying on unexamined assumptions

No, I'm not

and i'm prodding at them

I've answered your question already, you're just repeating yourself

Russian trolls have entered chat

They are focusing on a post modern viewpoint of deconstruction.

if you say i can't use something how is that not infringing on my freedom

You're so obviously trolling

Its not a troll.

i'm not

Yes it is a troll

Its a tactic.

It's not a tactic, he's playing dumb

I've answered his question

you haven't

Yes I have

hes just trying to establish freedom has necessary limits

You're playing the kid's game

i'm criticizing the idea that your conception of freedom is just being free to do things without punishment

I like games

because you think the restrictions imposed on people through property ownership are conducive to freedom

there is obviously something deeper here

kid - "why?"
mom - "Because xyz"
kid - "why?"
mom - "Because xyz"
kid - "why?"
mom - "Because xyz"
kid - "why?"
mom - "Because xyz"
kid - "why?"

I would say that freedom being the tolerance of individual action would be a fair better starting point.

I raised four kids, no problem

In politics it is established that humans are the actors of the game

The kid is at least curious

Therefore the limit of freedom is before the individual

i'm not just asking why though