Message from @TheCaledonian
Discord ID: 674995814048858126
if you say i can't use something how is that not infringing on my freedom
You're so obviously trolling
Its not a troll.
i'm not
Yes it is a troll
Its a tactic.
It's not a tactic, he's playing dumb
I've answered his question
you haven't
Yes I have
hes just trying to establish freedom has necessary limits
You're playing the kid's game
i'm criticizing the idea that your conception of freedom is just being free to do things without punishment
I like games
because you think the restrictions imposed on people through property ownership are conducive to freedom
there is obviously something deeper here
kid - "why?"
mom - "Because xyz"
kid - "why?"
mom - "Because xyz"
kid - "why?"
mom - "Because xyz"
kid - "why?"
mom - "Because xyz"
kid - "why?"
I would say that freedom being the tolerance of individual action would be a fair better starting point.
I raised four kids, no problem
In politics it is established that humans are the actors of the game
Therefore the limit of freedom is before the individual
i'm not just asking why though
i'm also explaining why your answers are not sufficient
You are exactly doing that,and I don't care to answer your questions anymore
Trump acquittal in a nutshell
https://youtu.be/QaOSbK_m1Mc
The reason why we don't let people steal things is because society as a whole collectively agreed it can't support thivery.
There is no tolerance to stealing therefore it can't be a freedom.
well i mean society as a whole could collectively agree to a lot of things i doubt he would consider to be conducive to freedom
Well he would just have to tolerate society's will to create a world he despises.
In order to be a person of principle.
i don't think that's the principle he's operating under
i mean i have an idea of what it is, but he wouldn't go far enough to say it
Probably not.
He is a believer in natural rights.
I believe there is only one true natural right that no government has ever infringed.
Might makes right.
Thats why citizens should be armed.
Not all citizens should be armed
For example, I dont think some Islamic terrorist that is born here and/or given citizenship should have the right to be armed
Imagine if EVERY citizen had proper protection. Big iron at their side. Good luck robbing a bank if 7 people in there are gonna pull out a colt .45