a group of sheep can still lose to a single wolf

how do the groups form in the first place and do groups have internal hierachies?

a group of sheep cant beat a wolf pack with an alpha

sure but i don't see how that example is applicable to humans and is a niche example of that and also they can't if there is alot of sheep and male sheep/rams, but still a weak point

well before skipping the conclusion to pseudo-science, i would first provide and substantiate your points with scientific doctirine @brett0007wastaken

alot of people say similar stuff like this but get away with it because its pseudo-science and from observation, it tends not to necesarilly be true

@xlD4NKlx basic evolutionary priciples,

if you stockpile and hoard you have more resorces to spare

a pack of humans with no leader will fall to an organised militia of humans when the strongest rise naturally to the top

not necesarilly, but please again, link to a scientific source to not spread misinformation

as long as each human in the pack is given the opportunity to rise they (the pack) will become the strongest

all your points are cute and all but you need to actually substantiate them with evidence

I mean... any conflict throughout history...

nibba this is basic shit go look it up yourself, evolution as a process is based on competion between individuals and the gradual change over time of the enviroment and the population

thats not a point, atleast link me to something, but still if you are going to say these behaviours exist, you need to link me to a scientific source or keyword of some kind to prove this, otherwise its just misinformation and anyone can do this shit lmao

not just in battle.. but in economical sense too... any communist state vs capitalist states

"basic shit" isn't an excuse and lmao why do i need to substantiate your points when you are the one doing this.

damn i've been reading back but i haven't seen *you* link to any scientific paper on why communism would work

if its so basic then substnaite it

thats like saying... substantiate that humans can breathe... just look at the world around you

@Crafty im not a communist and i asked for their takes since they are the ones making that arguement and also its an economic article but they can be refuted and such and aren't necesarilly indicitive of human behaviour all the time lmao

thats a flawed arguement because that example is self-evidental, however this isn't and you are pretty much lying at this point if you don't substantiate it @wacka

it is self evident

so your stance is to just devil's advocate for communism without any evidence for it being a good idea.. okay

next you'll be telling us Labour failed miserably.. but that wasnt real socialism

@xlD4NKlx also you are objectivly wrong on the reason humans are sucessful, coopertive hunting is not the sole reason we suceeded, most canines and lions/hyenas are far better adapted to natually kill in packs, it was a combination of tool use and stamina that saw us exel at persistance hunting.

what? kinda but i don't see how the evidence part is applicable lmao, in this scenario, this guy made a pseudo-scientific point about "basic human behaviour" however he needs to substantiate it with evidence and also anyone can just make up shit like this and spreading misinformation is fucked up @Crafty

yes and you are just making unsubsantiated claims

"guys, wolves can beat a group of sheep"... OMG thats misinformation and fakenews! Im telling the ministry of truth!!

you claims are a baseless as mine atm

sure, you need to use a holistic method to measure why we succeeded but if this is "basic" as you claim then why can't you just give some evidence of some sort

not really? You are mongering pseudo-science which can be proven, however im speaking about social science, i am really confused why you are equivocating the two lmao

@wacka lmao... can you try to give an arguement why you disagree, and your joke was pathetic lmao so it failed twice as hard

also your use of pseudo-science is incorrect pseudocience is non scientific study that is presented as science, not incorrect or outdated views

the joke wasnt mine... the joke is what you said

sure thats one definition but you saying, `except geed fundamentally is, the asshole apeman on the savannah that can horde the most resorces is the one most lighly to survive, greed is an inherent positive trait an animal because survival above all else is the game` is sorta made up and comes out of nowhere

@wacka LMAO, are you playing dumb at this point dude

the fact that you think what you said is a joke is also funny

except it does not

@wacka ok good job, i won't take you seriously for a long time, lmao `the joke wasnt mine... the joke is what you said` then goes to say just after, `the fact that you think what you said is a joke is also funny`

we're talking about social sciences and you're banging on about "spreading misinformation" 😛