Message from @Eccles
Discord ID: 664393268427096089
uk popn is about 20m too high
Eh disagree.
more if we want to adopt low-intensity, sustainable food production
The idea of population being "too high" is very non-existent imo
it's neither "very non-existen", nor "non-existent"
it's real, now, and if you disagree you're either scientifically illiterate, or delusional
lol
the habitat cannot support current population levels
The idea that our population is too high isn't scientific
it's your opinion
don't act like its more legitimate than it is
this is why environmentalists - i.e. proper scientists, not greta thunberg types, have been screaming about habitat loss and devestating species diversity loss for the last 20 years
I mean if you want no habitat loss at all then why not just round up all humans and kill em all
Because human civilisation does not mesh well with the survival of other animals
you're better than that, kunarian
You're better than that
Humans are more important than random animals
i'm telling you what the science says
they're not
They are
they're what make nature cycles work
And we can work out how to survive like we always have
yes, by limiting our population
No
We've never needed to limit population to survive
that's because limiting population was never the pressure before
It's always been a pressure
no
What are you talking about?
the pressure previously was having enough numbers to survive
go check your population graphs
No.
Population in the past wasn't easier to manage.
It caused massive problems.
it was self-managing
No it really wasn't.
Why do you think people used to starve more and plagues happened?
Not self managing at all.
population wasn't kept low by starvation and plague
Who said that?