what was that little speech I wasnt really listening?

he's just in a simple move, made it next to impossible for a bercow to happen again

he's a dying breed in Labour, that's for certain

if the speaker does something that appears to be against standing orders etc, the clark will be able to make a statement on it and put it in the library

he's probably a conservative by the moving of the overton window

How about -not- signing up to some fucked up definition of anti-semitism?

How about instead just not being a cunt?

Our system is based on honour until it fails

and it did fail

and the new one is doing something about it

so that's entirely proper

yeah like this shit is always weird; why can't we let social rules be social rules and not mince them into law

i mean, i don't think he made a law

are we still talking about what the speaker just did

Ahh shit, son, Dianne Abbot is at the box

i was talking about the whole anti-semitism stuff

what did the speaker just do ,tl;dr?

Time to turn the playback speed up to 1.5x so you can listen to it in normal time

@Crafty if the speaker does something that appears to be against standing orders etc, the clark will be able to make a statement on it and put it in the library

is this supposed to be in response to Bercow's behaviour?

yes

nothing was said that it was about bercow but it seemingly appears to be

i can't see any other reason

does 'putting it in the library' carry any weight ?

legally?

no

it wouldn't remove him from his seat

that would still have to be done by parl

but it means that if the speaker starts to break standing orders or traditions, then there's a record and it's by someone who is supposedly impartial and a protector of the traditions etc

basically its recording any possible transgressions

Hurry up and guillotine the little orc

It's mainly, if the speaker stops acting as speaker, and starts acting as a member in their own right and abusing the power of speaker, then the power is in the hands of the clark to make a written statement that could then be used as a base of removal for the speaker

it's not an invention of significant power, because it's not like the clark will be able to yeet someone on his own, he'd still need parl to agree with him

fucking idiot - you can't bemoan rising crime when you support mass immigration - the latter is a cause of the former

i wonder if she's wearing two left shoes today?

I for one think this is a very honourable thing that speaker has done, and if he carries on as he's started with this then he will make a fantastic historical speaker.

it's not the sort of role where you can afford to be a smarmy smartarse - you need to have the trust of all members

similar is true of police officers

which is why i bemoan the police being flooded with bullies, narcissists, jobsworths, and sjws

only 1.4% of reported rapes result in a successful prosecution, therefor 98.6% of reported rapes have perpetrators that got off

what a fucking idiot